The purpose of this collaborative best practice project is:
• Provide baseline requirements for the design of mechanical systems that minimize the volume of water required to operate HVAC systems.
• Balance environmental responsibility, resource efficiency, process efficacy, and community sensitivity.
• Support the goal of the development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.
A live public consultation opportunity was identified by our tracking algorithm. The public review draft is available at this link:
We hold all ASHRAE standards on the standing agenda of our Water, Energy and Mechanical teleconferences. See our CALENDAR for the next online meeting; open to everyone.
Earlier this year American Society of Plumbing Engineers released public review draft of its consensus product — ASPE 63 Rainwater Catchment Systems. The scope of this standard covers requirements for the design and installation of rainwater catchment systems that utilize the principle of collecting and using precipitation from a rooftop and other hard, impervious building surfaces. This standard does not apply to the collection of rainwater from vehicular parking or other similar surfaces.
Click on the link below to view the redline regarding U.S. EPA Guide Standard and Protocol for Testing Microbiological Water Purifiers or to NSF Protocol P231.
That is all we see from ASPE on this and other standards; most likely owing to the pandemic. ASPE typically posts its redlines in ANSI Standards Action and on the landing page for its standards development enterprise:
Note that many of its products are co-developed with NSF International, IAPMO and the American Rainwater Catchment Systems Association, among others. It is noteworthy that ASPE provides a detailed description of the User Interest; which enlightens understanding of the lamentable presence of the User Interest, thus the raison d’être of Standards Michigan.
University of Warsaw Rooftop Rain Garden
We place the ASPE suite on the standing agenda of our monthly Water teleconferences. See our CALENDAR about when and how to log in; always open to everyone.
Issue: [13-61]
Category: Water, Mechanical
Colleagues: Jack Janveja, Richard Robben, Larry Spielvogel
This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send [email protected] a request for subscription details.
This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send [email protected] a request for subscription details.
This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send [email protected] a request for subscription details.
Johannes Vermeer, View of Delft (Mauritshuis, The Hague) 1660-1661
The use of blockchain technology for Internet of Things (IoT) enables decentralized, autonomous communication (peer-to-peer, consumer-to-machine, machine-to-machine) without the need for a trusted intermediary. These intermediaries exist in nearly every dimension of the education industry even though we may only be hardly aware of them. Energy and municipal bond markets (that finance building construction and operation) are only two examples of spaces characterized by the presence of multiple intermediaries.
The need for standards that offer a protocol, common vernacular and support interoperability between blockchain platforms is gathering pace and the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) is a natural home for them; though there is already significant competition among legacy standards developers; especially those financed by incumbent stakeholders. Apart from the market-making among incumbents that is a natural part of the innovation cycle standardization of a framework for blockchain use in IoT will provide a base common understanding enabling innovation in IoT markets.
The IEEE 2418 group of standards provide a common framework for blockchain usage, implementation, and interaction in IoT applications. Standard P2418.1 is the parent standard for the following spin-off standards which should interest @StandardsMich followers:
The framework contemplated in the P2418-suite addresses scalability, security and privacy challenges with regard to blockchain in IoT. Blockchain tokens, smart contracts, transaction, asset, credentialed network, permissioned IoT blockchain, and permission-less IoT blockchain are included in the framework. We start with foundational standard P2418.1 – Standard for the Framework of Blockchain Use in Internet of Things
P2418.1 is currently under development and, according to the IEEE Standards Association consensus product development process, will reach a milestone at the end of December 2021. At the moment we are following but not actively participating on the committee because we are watching action in the competitive landscape among legacy accredited standards developers as well as emergent, open-source standards developers. If you would like to participate in the development of the IEEE 2418 suite the IEEE contact person is Philip Wennblom ([email protected]).
Whatever we do will be coordinated with the IEEE Education & Healthcare Facilities Committee which meets online 4 times monthly in European and American time zones. We also include this standard on our Blockchain Standards teleconferences. See our CALENDAR for the next online meeting.
Issue: [17-352]
Category: Blockchain, Energy, Finance & Management, Information & Communications Technology
Colleagues: Mike Anthony, Jim Harvey, Jack Janveja
This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send [email protected] a request for subscription details.
This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send [email protected] a request for subscription details.
This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send [email protected] a request for subscription details.
This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send [email protected] a request for subscription details.
New update alert! The 2022 update to the Trademark Assignment Dataset is now available online. Find 1.29 million trademark assignments, involving 2.28 million unique trademark properties issued by the USPTO between March 1952 and January 2023: https://t.co/njrDAbSpwBpic.twitter.com/GkAXrHoQ9T
