IBC §116 | Unsafe Structures & Equipment

Loading
loading...

IBC §116 | Unsafe Structures & Equipment

March 27, 2018
mike@standardsmichigan.com
No Comments

There is a group of proposals now under consideration by the ICC Building Code Action Committee (BCAC) that is being prepared for the International Code Council’s meetings April 15 to 25, 2018 in Columbus, Ohio.   The intent of these proposals is a start to improving consistency in Chapter 1 of the 2021 International Building Code.  The definitions in the document linked below are scoped to administrative content across most of the ICC standard suite.   The “Reason” (substantiation) statements — always a required in the ICC process — indicate which codes have the same information and with no proposed changes.  Where there is coordination with the International Residential Codes or the ICC Energy codes, the proposals in the link below show Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3 since Chapter 1 of those codes is heard in breakout hearings by those code committees:

BCAC Proposals for Administrative Coordination of Unsafe Structures and Equipment ADM 1-4

Queries about the BCAC committee may be directed to Ed Wirtschorek (ewirtschoreck@iccsafe.org).  To participate more broadly in International Code Council consensus documents you need only register as a stakeholder in ICC cdpACCESS.  We will also add this item to the standing agenda of our weekly Open Door teleconferences (every Wednesday 11 AM Eastern Time) to which everyone is welcomed:

https://standardsmichigan.com/event/

Issue: [18-73]

Category: Facility Asset Management, Architectural, Public Safety, Risk Management, Space Planning

Contact: Mike Anthony (mike@standards michigan.com), Richard Robben (rrobben1951@gmail.com)


NFPA 70 | 2020 National Electrical Code Balloting

March 23, 2018
mike@standardsmichigan.com
No Comments

This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.

ASSE Z690.2 / ISO 31000 | Risk Management

March 22, 2018
mike@standardsmichigan.com
No Comments

This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.

UL 1004 | Standard for Electric Generators

March 20, 2018
mike@standardsmichigan.com
No Comments

This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.

BIFMA X.6 | Educational Seating

March 1, 2018
mike@standardsmichigan.com
No Comments

This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.

ISO Business Excellence Framework

March 1, 2018
mike@standardsmichigan.com
No Comments

This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.

ICT for Healthcare Facilities

March 1, 2018
mike@standardsmichigan.com
No Comments

This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.

APCO 1.111.2 | Public Safety Communications

February 17, 2018
mike@standardsmichigan.com
No Comments

This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.

OSTP | National Strategic Plan for Manufacturing

February 15, 2018
mike@standardsmichigan.com
No Comments

Click on image for ANSI announcement

 

Many colleges, universities, trade and technical schools have stakeholders — either as faculty and students — in the United State manufacturing sector.   Many allocated significant resources to facilities and grant administrators that support this activity.  The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) encourages the US standards federation to participate in this process.  Some of the questions to inform development of the plan are as follows:

  • In priority order, what should be the near-term and long-term objectives for advanced manufacturing, including R&D objectives, the anticipated time frame for achieving the objectives, and the metrics for use in assessing progress toward the objectives?
  • How can Federal agencies and federally funded R&D centers supporting advanced manufacturing R&D foster the transfer of R&D results into new manufacturing technologies and United States-based manufacturing of new products and processes for the benefit of society to ensure national, energy, and economic security? What role can public-private partnerships play, and how should they be structured for maximum impact?
  • What innovative tools, platforms, technologies are needed for advances in manufacturing? Of those that already exist, what are the barriers to their adoption?
  • How can such Federal agencies and centers develop and strengthen all levels of manufacturing education and training programs to ensure an adequate, well-trained U.S. workforce for the new advanced manufacturing jobs of the future?
  • How can such Federal agencies and centers assist small and medium-sized manufacturers in developing and implementing new products and processes?  
  • How would you assess the state of the following factors and how they impact innovation and competitiveness for United States advanced manufacturing?

Comments are due March 7th.   You may access the page to review the complete document, to key in comments or to communicate directly with the agency leading this effort at this link: (Federal Register.)

IEC TC 56 | Dependability

February 12, 2018
mike@standardsmichigan.com
No Comments

(Click on image)

The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) releases draft standards Committee Drafts for Votes (CDV’s) that are open for public review and comment; contingent upon national policies and coordination with national standards bodies such as USNC/IEC.   (The Secretariat for Technical Committee 56 is the United Kingdom). We curate this action for the user interest in the education industry and university-affiliated medical research and healthcare delivery enterprises here (Recent CDV’s from IEC).

Of particular interest to subject matter experts in several building technologies may be a recent release by IEC Technical Committee 56 Dependability.   A “clean” version (i.e. a draft with strike-and-bold removed) of its dual-logo risk management document — IEC/ISO 31010 Risk management and risk assessment techniques — is now open for public comment.  This, and other documents produced by the IEC and ISO should be regarded as templates for the development of national technical and business policy; hence our frequent reference to consensus standards as “regulatory products”.

Dependability — or reliability as it is understood in other technical disciplines — affects decisions about electrical power generation, fire safety, information technology, finance — to name a few.  With so many stakeholders moving to meet the needs of economies that are growing, it is not unwise to at least be sensitive to the needs of other economies as reflected in the standards for dependable products and systems.

The CDV provides guidance on the selection and application of various techniques that can be used to help improve the way uncertainty is taken into account and to help understand risk.   Comments are due February 16th.   

Hybrid operating theatre | Rome, Italy

Because access to this document is “coordinated” we refer this the IEEE Education & Healthcare Facilities Committee (which meets online again on Tuesday, January 30th) and we will also place this on the agenda of our Open Door teleconference this coming Wednesday, 11 AM Eastern time.  Anyone is welcomed to join this teleconferences with the login information in this link (Click here)

Issue: [11-4]

Contact: Mike Anthony

 

Layout mode
Predefined Skins
Custom Colors
Choose your skin color
Patterns Background
Images Background
Skip to content