Category Archives: Monthly Public Safety

Loading
loading...

Guide to Premises Security

School of Aristotle | Gustav Spangenberg

Managing capital‐intensive campus infrastructure embedded within a politically sensitive community presents challenges not present in private industry real assets. Differences in everything from department culture to annual facility use patterns mean that facility managers cannot implement the same safety approaches in all buildings.  Approaches must be scaled and tailored to the occupancy type and informed by the interconnectedness and the specifics of a given facility.  Accordingly, the original University of Michigan standards advocacy enterprise (see ABOUT) began following the development of safety concepts in both NFPA 730 and NFPA 731 with the release of the 2008 Edition.   Thereafter, it collaborated with trade associations and subject matter experts from other universities (notably Georgetown University and Evergreen State University) to advocate user-interest concepts in the 2011 revisions.

Since 2008, campus security issues have only become more complex technically; across an expanding minefield of sensitivities.   Since 2008 we have observed the emergence of about one-hundred new consensus products being developed by the same number of new trade associations and producers presenting campus security solutions.

NFPA 730 Guide to Premise Security is a consensus document that describes construction, protection, occupancy features, and practices intended to reduce security vulnerabilities to life and property.  Related document — NFPA 731 Standard for the Installation of Electronic Premises Security Systems covers the application, location, installation, performance, testing, and maintenance of electronic premises security systems and their components.   The first is a performance document; the second a prescriptive document for the construction, operation and maintenance of electrotechnologies that support premise security.

Public consultation on the 2023 revision closed January 5, 2022 however the NITMAM process permits additional comment at the 2023 NFPA Annual meeting in Las Vegas in June 2023.

The 2026 Edition is now open for public input until January 4, 2024.

Public Comment on the First Draft of the 2026 Edition will be received until January 3, 2025

As always, we encourage direct participation by user-interests supporting the education facility industry.   You may do so by CLICKING HERE.

It is never a bad idea to key in comments on your own but if you would like some insight into our advocacy vectors since 2008 you are welcomed to click in our periodic Risk and Public Safety colloquia during which time we pick through technical, policy and enforcement specifics.   We have been hammering on Chapters 11 and 12, Education and Healthcare Facilities, respectively; for five cycles.   See our CALENDAR for the next online meeting; open to everyone.

 

Issue: [10-3], [11-58], [14-44] and [16-127]

Category: Electrical, Telecommunications, Information & Communications Technology, Public Safety, Risk Management, #SmartCampus

Colleagues: Mike Anthony, Jim Harvey, Richard Robben


More

Department of Homeland Security: K-12 School Security

National Campus Safety and Security Project

NFPA 730 2023 Public Input Report

NFPA 730 730_F2019_PMM_AAA_FD_PIresponses

NFPA 730_F2019_PMM_AAA_SD_PCresponses

ARCHIVE / NFPA 730 Guide to Premises Security

 

The Hartford Consensus

“After School” / Norman Rockwell

The National Fire Protection Association is one of the first names among ANSI accredited standards setting organizations developing consensus products to meet the demand of education communities.   Free access to one of its parent titles in this domain is linked below:

Standard for an Active Shooter/Hostile Even Response Program

Much of the concepts in this expanding literature are informed by a product from the American College of Surgeons which presents a template for the formulation of policies and procedures to enhance survivability from intentional mass casualty and active shooter events.

The Hartford Consensus

We respond to live public consultation notices for best practice titles relevant to education community safety during any of our Risk and Security teleconferences.  See our CALENDAR for the next online meeting; open to everyone

 

Security 100

[metaslider id=”74230″]

 

“We worry about what a child will become tomorrow,

yet we forget that he is someone today.”

– Stacia Tauscher

 

Today we run a status check on the stream of technical and management standards evolving to assure the highest possible level of security for education communities.  The literature expands significantly from an assortment of national standards-setting bodies, trade associations, ad hoc consortia and open source standards developers.  CLICK HERE for a sample of our work in this domain.

School security is big business in the United States.  A few years ago we could deal with physical security separately from cybersecurity.  Not so much anymore.  In today’s colloquium — essentially a survey module presenting a broad overview — we seek to understand product and interoperability standards for the following technologies:

Video surveillance: indoor and outdoor cameras, cameras with night vision and motion detection capabilities and cameras that can be integrated with other security systems for enhanced monitoring and control.

Access control: doors, remote locking, privacy and considerations for persons with disabilities.

As time permits, we will reckon with first cost and long-term maintenance cost, including software maintenance.

Bob Hope Primary School Kadena Air Base

According to a report by Markets and Markets, the global school and campus security market size was valued at USD 14.0 billion in 2019 and is projected to reach USD 21.7 billion by 2025, at a combined annual growth rate of 7.2% during the forecast period.  Another report by Research And Markets estimates that the US school security market will grow at a compound annual growth rate of around 8% between 2020 and 2025, driven by factors such as increasing incidents of school violence, rising demand for access control and surveillance systems, and increasing government funding for school safety initiatives.

Noteworthy: The combined annual growth rate of the school and campus security market is greater than the growth rate of the education “industry” itself.

Security 200


Education Community Safety catalog is one of the fast-growing catalogs of best practice literature.  We link a small sample below and update ahead of every Security colloquium.

Executive Order 13929 of June 16, 2020 Safe Policing for Safe Communities

Clery Act

National Center for Education Statistics: School Safety and Security Measures

International Code Council

2021 International Building Code

Section 1010.1.9.4 Locks and latches

Section 1010.2.13 Delayed egress.

Section 1010.2.14 Controlled egress doors in Groups I-1 and I-2.

Free Access: NFPA 72 National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code

Free Access: NFPA 731 Standard for the Installation of Premises Security Systems

IEEE: Design and Implementation of Campus Security System Based on Internet of Things

APCO/NENA 2.105 Emergency Incident Data Document 

C-TECC Tactical Emergency Casualty Care Guidelines

Department of Transportation Emergency Response Guidebook 2016

NENA-STA-004.1-2014 Next Generation United States Civic Location Data Exchange Format

Example Emergency Management and Disaster Preparedness Plan (Tougaloo College,  Jackson, Mississippi)

Partner Alliance for Safer Schools

Federal Bureau of Investigation Academia Program

Most Dangerous Universities in America

Federal Bureau of Investigation: Uniform Crime Reporting Program

ICYMI: Guide to Campus Security

 

 

 

 

Alarm & Electronic Security Systems

“The Peaceable Kingdom” 1833) Edward Hicks

 

“The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid,

and the calf and the young lion and fatling together; and a little child shall lead them.”

— Issiah 11:16

 

 

The security of educational communities have had far too many drivers for innovation in security apparatus and amanagement systems in recent years.  In addition to tragic headline events, the growth of sporting events as revenue drivers and brand identity support run in the same tributary.  Accordingly, we follow action in international electrotechnology standards because, as the Internet of Things rolls out, we find synaptic connection growth happening at warp speed.   Products are changing; systems are changing and — of course — software/middleware/firmware is changing.

Templates for safety and sustainability goals are already in consensus products of the Genève sister organizations that support the voluntary consensus-based International Standards system.

Most of the innovation in alarm and electronic security systems is undertaken by multi-national industrial conglomerates with a synergistic relationship with consensus product development administered by the International Electrotechnical Commission. We are routinely on the receiving end of public commenting opportunity presented by IEC Technical Committee 79; its landing page linked below:

IEC TC 79 Alarm and electronic security systems / Strategic Business Plan

Contingent upon setting up a (free) account, the IEC standards development platform is open to the public — i.e. anyone may comment upon an exposure draft.

Since the beginning of 2020 we have reviewed redlines of standards listed below:

– Access control systems;
– Alarm transmission systems;
– Video surveillance systems;
– Combined and/or integrated systems even including fire alarm systems;
– Fire detection and fire alarm systems;
– Intruder and hold-up alarm systems;
– Remote receiving and/or surveillance centres;
– Social alarm systems.

We refer IEC calls for public consultation to the IEEE Education & Healthcare Facilities Committee but keep track of them on the provisional workspace linked below:

USNC/IEC Workspace*

We maintain the work products of this committee on the standing agenda of our Security, Prometheus, Global and Risk colloquia.  See our CALENDAR for the next online meeting; open to everyone.

[metaslider id=”32404″]

Issue: [15-162]

Category: Electrical, Telecommunication, Risk Management, Fire Protection, International

Colleagues: Mike Anthony, Jim Harvey, Kane Howard, Richard Robben

*This workspace was converted (June 10th) to the new Google Sites; recently required by the University of Michigan.   We hope for zero, or few bugs in the conversion.


LEARN MORE:

S. 2530 / School Safety Clearinghouse Act

Photo by Architect of the Capitol | Left: The teacher and children in a “little red schoolhouse” represent an important part of American education in the 1800s.
Right: Students attend a land grant college, symbolic of the national commitment to higher learning.

S. 2530: School Safety Clearinghouse Act

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish a School Safety Clearinghouse, and for other purposes.


5.4.20

Protected: Cybersecurity Training for Public Safety Personnel

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Protected: Public Safety Communications Common Status Codes for Data Exchange

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Layout mode
Predefined Skins
Custom Colors
Choose your skin color
Patterns Background
Images Background