Category Archives: #SmartCampus

Loading
loading...

Audiovisual Experiences

Media production audio visual

The Audiovisual and Integrated Experience Association  is an ANSI-accredited standards setting organization that, since its founding in 1939, has accumulated more than 11,400 enterprise and individual members, including manufacturers, systems integrators, dealers and distributors, consultants, programmers, live events companies, technology managers, content producers, and multimedia professionals from more than 80 countries.  It throws off a fairly steady stream of best practice literature every year.

From its mission statement:

AVIXA members create integrated AV experiences that deliver outcomes for end users. AVIXA is a hub for professional collaboration, information, and community, and is the leading resource for AV standards, certification, training, market intelligence, and thought leadership.

From its filing with ANSI:

AVIXA intends to develop standards of the nature of the “performance” of various aspects of audiovisual systems. These fall into the categories of audio, visual, control systems, user interfaces, etc. These standards are specific to systems but not to equipment.

When special event contracts are written that include the statement — “conform to all applicable standards” — AVIXA standards would be understood as setting the quality benchmark for the audio-visual experience.   Apart from the local Fire Marshall and Electrical Inspector charged with event safety, there is no organized conformance stakeholder other than the customer (in our case, education communities).   In recent years we have seen the emergence of a new cadre of “event inspectors” (which means conference, training and certification revenue for non-profits); a topic we will cover in a separate post.

AVIXA’s standards setting enterprise is solid — conforms to all due process requirements — but struggles mightily for user-interest participation (as do other ANSI accredited standards setting organizations):

AVIXA Standards Public Review Status

Montclair University

Now that pandemic has off-loaded large chunks of the residential “campus experience” to the internet,  we need to step up our mindfulness about how A/V experiences support instructional and cultural needs of education communities.   With the respect to the electrotechnical installations themselves:

a)  Should they be built and managed as a central resource to an entire school district, college, or university?

b) Should they be built and managed by smaller, individual academic and business units?

c) Something in between.

We hazard a guess that choice (c) is the likely outcome.  There are “haves” and “have-nots” in education communities; just as there are in the world at large.  The more we demand of these enterprises, the more they will cost.

Ryerson University

We maintain the AVIXA suite on our Lively Arts colloquia.  See our CALENDAR for the next online meeting; open to everyone.

 

Issue: [18-349]

Category: Lively Arts, Electrical, ICT

Colleagues: Mike Anthony, Jim Harvey, Mark Scott

Archive / AVIXA

 

 

Technical Negotiation Skills for Students

This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send [email protected] a request for subscription details.

Electric Vehicle Energy Management

Edison electric vehicle | National Park Service, US Department of the Interior

The Canadian counterpart to the American National Standards Institute provides a platform for public comment on its consensus products:

CSA Group Draft Review

The platform provides an intuitive way into a draft standard and a way to comment upon it.

Today we take note of a product farther up the pipeline regarding electric vehicles.  Earlier this year the CSA Group (CSA America Standards Inc.) has given public notice of its intent to develop a new standard to be titled: CSA C22.2 Electric Vehicle Energy Management Systems.  From the ANSI New Project Initiation Notification announcement:

Project Need: CSA Group has been approached by the industry to develop standards and technical requirements for the deployment and safe operations of EVEMS within the Canadian regulatory structure and utility requirements. This project is intended to address this need and the existing gap in the standards required for the operation of EVEMS.

Stakeholders: Regulators, manufacturers, utilities, and industry associations.

With the rapidly growing penetration of Electric Vehicles (EVs), there is an increased demand to develop technology to support the efficient and safe charging of the vehicles with less impacts on the current electrical distribution infrastructure during peak charging times. In addition to managing the demand for electricity, EVs can become energy storage devices for the grid. This possibility raises the need to view EVs and related charging equipment as an Electric Vehicle Energy Management System (EVEMS). An EVEMS is a means of controlling electric vehicle supply equipment loads comprised of any of the following: a monitor(s), communications equipment, a controller(s), a timer(s) and other applicable device(s). Today there is no clear standard or guideline to help define the safe operations of an EVEMS although individual standards exist for some of the components within the EVEMS.

The announcement was filed in February 2019.   CSA Group has only filed formal notification required in ANSI’s due process requirements*.   

The project is on our watch list.  Many research universities are on the receiving end of electric vehicle research projects and also have large campus transportation fleets that are converting to electric vehicles.   Should any public review drafts be released we typically coordinate our response with the IEEE Education & Healthcare Facilities Committee which meets online 4 times monthly.

CSA Group consensus products are also on the standing agenda of our periodic Global teleconferences; open to everyone.  See our CALENDAR for the next online meeting.

University of Ottawa

Issue: [19-60]

Category: Administration & Management, Electrical, Energy, Facility Asset Management, International, Transportation & Parking, #SmartCampus

Colleagues: Mike Anthony, Lorne Clark, Nehad El Sherif, Jim Harvey, Abra O’Leary

Source: ANSI Standards Action


LEARN MORE:

Artificial Intelligence

“The_Geographer” | Johannes Vermeer

#SmartCampus is an electrotechnical transformation.   There is no other industry more sensitive to competitor claims of “smartness” than the education industry in any nation.

Though there are many open source consortia moving rapidly to claim ownership of this space these consortia may not meet the criteria for large scale adoption that often results from market acceptance, recognition and endorsement by local, state and federal government.   At the moment the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers is the first name in consensus standards for artificial intelligence technology.  Today we list three standards early in their trajectory in which the education facilities industry — as a user of this technology — can have an influence guaranteed by ANSI Due process requirements for American national standards:

P7008 – Standard for Ethically Driven Nudging for Robotic, Intelligent and Autonomous Systems

Nudges, as exhibited by robotic, intelligent or autonomous systems, are defined as overt or hidden suggestions designed to influence human behavior or emotions. Sponsored by the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society, IEEE P7008 delineates the concepts, functions and benefits necessary to establish and ensure ethically driven methodologies for the design of robotic, intelligent and autonomous systems in accordance with worldwide ethics and moral theories, with an emphasis on aligning the ethics and engineering communities to understand how to pragmatically design and implement these systems. Prospectus: IEEE Artificial Intelligence Standard P7008

P7009 – Standard for Fail-Safe Design of Autonomous and Semi-Autonomous Systems

Malfunctioning autonomous and semi-autonomous systems can disadvantage and harm users, society, and the environment. Effective fail-safe mechanisms can help mitigate risks related to system malfunction and provide developers, installers and operators with clear technical criteria to terminate unsuccessful or compromised operations in a safe and consistent manner. Sponsored by the IEEE Reliability Society, IEEE P7009 establishes clear procedures for measuring, testing, and certifying a system’s ability to fail safely on a scale from weak to strong, with instructions for improving system performance. The standard provides a basis for developers, as well as users and regulators, to design robust and transparent fail-safe mechanisms for increased accountability.  Prospectus: IEEE Artificial Intelligence Standard P7009

P7010 – Wellbeing Metrics Standard for Ethical Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems

Today, with the advancement of autonomous and intelligent systems, programmers, engineers, and technologists need to consider how the products and services they create can increase human wellbeing based on a wider spectrum of measure than economic growth and productivity alone (i.e., emotional health, societal impacts, environment, etc.). Sponsored by the IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society, IEEE P7010 identifies wellbeing Indicators and metrics relating to human factors directly affected by autonomous and intelligent systems and establishes a baseline for aligning the types of objective and subjective data these systems should analyze and include, in both programming and functionality, to proactively utilize these technologies to increase human well being.  Prospectus: IEEE Artificial Intelligence Standard P7010

All three standardization projects completed balloting in December 2018.   This is a milestone in the technical committee’s work before the drafts are released for public review and posted in the link below:*

IEEE Standards Association Public Review

While the influence of these standards may not show up directly, or even discernably in facility management operations budgets we will keep an eye on them.  We will collaborate with the IEEE Education & Healthcare Facilities Committee where such collaboration can be effective.  We are happy to discuss these standards any day at 11 AM Eastern time during our daily livecast.  Log in with the credentials at the upper right of our home page.

IEEE Silicon Valley Chapter home page

 

Issue: [18-290] [18-291] [18-292]

Category: #SmartCampus, Electrical, Telecommunications, Information and Computer Technology, Facility Asset Management

Colleagues: Mike Anthony, Jim Harvey, Kane Howard, Richard Robben

*If this page will not load for you, we recommend you contact the IEEE-SA (CLICK HERE)


LEARN MORE:

 

The Transformative Power of Blockchain and AI Drive Dynamic Discussions at ANSI’s Highly Successful Joint Member Forum 2018

ANSI’s Legal Issues Forum Draws 100 Professionals for Discussion of Legal, Societal, and Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence

5.6.2020

Standards Coordinating Committee 18

“Night View of Cherry Blossoms in Shin Yoshiwara” c. 1889 / Los Angeles County Museum of Art / Artist: Inoue Yasuji / Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Felix Juda

IEEE Standards Coordinating Committee 18 is charged with reconciling electrotechnology standards action between two dominant electrical safety cultures in the United States:

  • The National Fire Protection Association’s NFPA 70-suite which primarily covers fire safety of electrical systems 34.5 kilovolts and below within buildings.   This culture is dominated by fire safety experts but has a significant revenue stream that originated in the fact and perception that electricity was a fire hazard. 
  • IEEE suite of electrical power safety codes and recommended practices for electrical safety at all voltage levels — from micro-voltages to upwards of 1000 kilovolts within and and outside buildings.  This culture is dominated by utility engineers with expertise at higher voltages to which the general public is exposed outside buildings.  

The consensus documents produced by these two electrical safety cultures are usually incorporated by reference into local and state public safety laws.  For the most part, all safety and sustainability requirements for user interests, and what practices will set the standard of care for the US education industry and others, will appear on the agenda of IEEE SCC-18

The years 2018 and 2019 are active years for NFPA-70 and the IEEE technical committees.  The IEEE Power Engineering and Industrial Applications Society, which has a near 100 year tenure in electrical power systems safety and sustainability for all US industries, are dealing with a coincident revision cycle of the 2020 National Electrical Code and the ANSI/IEEE C2 National Electrical Safety Code.   Technical and policy experts are engaged in lively leading practice discovery discussion about distributed resources, power-over-ethernet circuits, electric and autonomous vehicles and Internet-of-Things; among others.  The rollout of the emergent #SmartCampus is necessarily an electrotechnical transformation so it is necessary to keep pace with, and to be effective advocates in global safety and sustainability documents produced by the International Electrotechnical Commission.

An illustration from Jules Verne’s short story “La Journée d’un Journaliste Américain en 2889” (In the Year 2889) by George Roux / c. 1910

 

Standards Michigan has its “door” open every day at 11 AM Eastern time for 1-1 consultation on the entire suite of electrotechnical standards that affect the education facilities industry but twice monthly, concentrates on electrical power and information and communication technology movements.  Movements that happen on a near-hourly basis; hence our identification of the stream standardization and conformity activity.   See our CALENDAR for the next online meetings; open to everyone.   Please note that these teleconferences are coordinated with the IEEE Education & Healthcare Facilities Committee; landing page linked below:

http://sites.ieee.org/icps-ehe/

University of Michigan College of Engineering

Issue: [Various]

Category: Electrical, Telecommunication, #SmartCampus, Information & Communications Technology

Colleagues: Mike Anthony, Robert G. Arno, Christel Hunter, Mario Spina, Jim Harvey, Mike Hiler, David Law


LEARN MORE:

Archive: IEEE SCC-18 Business

 

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ELECTRICAL INSTALLATIONS

This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send [email protected] a request for subscription details.

Social Media in Public Safety Communications

This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send [email protected] a request for subscription details.

Higher Education Act of 1965

This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send [email protected] a request for subscription details.

Data Center Standards

This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send [email protected] a request for subscription details.

USNC/IEC Call for Experts

This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send [email protected] a request for subscription details.

Layout mode
Predefined Skins
Custom Colors
Choose your skin color
Patterns Background
Images Background
Skip to content