School Security Standards | Standards Michigan

School Security Standards

The competition among standards developers to meet a national challenge is already quite fierce. We offer a "watchdog" point of view on this action that may enlighten the understanding of local and state educational facility security officials.

Loading
loading...

School Security Standards

August 9, 2018
mike@standardsmichigan.com
No Comments

“The Country School” | Winslow Homer

Our tenure in consensus standards development for education facilities (see ABOUT) may enlighten education industry leaders about how the standard of care is set by  ANSI accredited and open source standards.  There are now so many standards relevant to risk to educational communities — and so many trade associations competing to set the standard of care —  that legislators have a strong case for developing top-down federal legislation rather than incorporate by reference privately developed standards which are given preferential treatment in Office of Management & Budget Circular A-119.  While far from perfect, the private standards system administered by ANSI’s due process requirement provides access, balance and transparency.

Some of the most recent action within the more familiar standards suites is linked below:

School Security Concepts


Standard for Preparedness and Response to Active Shooter and/or Hostile Events


Door Locking Systems

 


Guide to Premises Security

ASIS WVPI.1 | Workplace Violence Prevention and Intervention

Incident Handling


This is a timely, subtle and complicated issue for the education industry.   The overwhelming question — upon which good minds will disagree — is this: How much of this can be resolved by the federal government versus resolution at the state, local and institutional level?

Market incumbents (whom we identify in our ABOUT) want to develop regulations at the national level because they have the financial resources to operate in Washington, D.C where so many education industry trade associations are domiciled and have their influence.   In other words, they will seek a politically visible “top-down” solution that they write and administer that may supersede state, local or institutionally developed standards*.

On the other hand, school districts, colleges and universities may prefer local adaptations of regulatory products developed by ANSI accredited standards developers with which their front line subject matter experts in building, fire, electrical and public safety codes are already trained.  Standards developed at this level — and, ideally incorporated by reference by federal agencies, offer the greatest degree of transparency and stakeholder involvement.  Unfortunately, much of the leadership of the education industry is not involved in the US standards community.  (See videoclip below)

Since our business model does not depend upon revenue from membership, publication royalties, conference attendance, continuing education credits for conformity assessment credentials we are relatively free to operate as a watchdog on the standards action of all the incumbents (and newcomers) in this space.

Education facility security standards are a standing item on our weekly Open Door teleconference — every Wednesday 11 AM Eastern time.  Click here to log in.

Issue: [Various]

Category: Public Safety, Public Policy

Colleagues: Mike Anthony, Richard Robben


S. Joe Bhatia | CEO American National Standards Institute | University of Michigan Ross School of Business | October 2015

 


* Partial Bibliography:

NIST Public Safety Communications Research Division

Loyola Marymount University Emergency Preparedness Program

Preparing for an Active Shooter Incident Duquesne University

Layout mode
Predefined Skins
Custom Colors
Choose your skin color
Patterns Background
Images Background