Author Archives: mike@standardsmichigan.com

Southern Methodist University | Dallas County

All the work we do intervening in technical standards setting to make educational settlements safer, simpler, lower-cost and longer-lasting does not keep pace with the growth rate of the largest non-residential building construction market in the United States which is presently challenged by international demand; but perhaps not for long.

Resource Guide

What do REITs actually build on campus?

• Most university-linked REIT activity is in student housing.

• Publicly traded REITs (e.g., American Campus Communities, EdR before acquisition) invest heavily in dormitories, apartments, and mixed-use retail.

• They typically do not build core academic facilities (labs, classrooms) or administrative buildings.

Why do universities use REITs?

• To outsource capital costs. Universities avoid debt on their balance sheets.

• REITs finance, build, and sometimes operate student housing under long-term ground leases or Public-Private Partnerships (P3s).

• Universities see this as a way to expand housing quickly without issuing bonds.

While REITs don’t “overbuild” in the academic sense, they can fuel:

• Overcapacity in student housing if enrollment projections are wrong or decline.

• Pressure to approve new beds even as demand flattens or drops.

• Long-term financial obligations (e.g., guaranteed occupancy rates in P3 contracts) that burden universities if enrollment falls.

• Some universities guaranteed minimum occupancy in REIT partnerships. If enrollment dipped, they had to subsidize empty rooms.

Most overbuilding in core facilities—labs, classrooms, administrative space—has been driven by:

• Ambitious master plans

• Competition for prestige

• Donor-driven construction

• Misaligned enrollment forecasts
  

We leave the topic of “Football Field Syndrome” for another day.

This Washington D.C. – based non-profit’s founding originated at the University of Michigan in the 1920’s and has long since expanded affiliates in several North American regions and states.  It maintains one of the most active bibliography on space utilization, curated here to support today’s colloquium.

How Understanding Campus Utilization Rates Can Reduce Your Institution’s Carbon Footprint

“The State of Facilities in Higher Education: Space, Spending, & Staff” (June 2024)
Discusses the tension between campus building stock and declining enrollment, examining the ratio of space-to-enrollment growth, and exploring how institutions are reducing footprint amid surplus space

“Changing the Facilities Backlog Conversation in Higher Education” (July/August 2021)
Covers how colleges manage over 6 billion sq ft of campus space, a deferred maintenance backlog of $112 billion, and strategies (“Catch Up” & “Keep Up”) for dealing with excess and aging space

“Gordian Partners with APPA to Estimate Higher Education Infrastructure Backlog Need” (July 2021)
Details the count of 6.2 billion sq ft in 210,000 buildings, average age nearing 50 years, and current replacement value exceeding $2 trillion—highlighting the need to reassess and reduce physical footprint

“Abstract: Space Planning and Administration” (Body of Knowledge, ~2019)
Describes how some universities manage 20 million+ sq ft on a single site, emphasizing processes to inventory, classify, and efficiently use space, noting underutilized spaces like athletic fields (“football field syndrome”)

“The State of Facilities in Higher Education: Facilities Manager Magazine” (March/April 2025)
While full access is member‑only, the issue’s focus (“Elevating Student Experiences”) includes featured articles on repurposing and rightsizing spaces in response to shifting enrollment.

“Institutional Success” (APPA Thought Leaders Series, circa 2014)
Outlines how reducing campus square footage—such as demolishing 120,000 sq ft of trailers and replacing with 175,000 sq ft centralized facility—can save ~$1.6 M annual maintenance

Standards Michigan About