We continue build out of our collaboration architecture for “code writers and vote-getters” begun at the University of Michigan in 1993. We are now drilling down into state and local adaptations of nationally developed codes and standards that are incorporated by reference into public safety and sustainability legislation.
Proud neo-classicism: Senn High School, Chicago. Architect: Arthur Hussander. pic.twitter.com/LCfJ2Xa8I2
— Blair Kamin (@BlairKamin) May 9, 2020
This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send [email protected] a request for subscription details.
This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send [email protected] a request for subscription details.
This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send [email protected] a request for subscription details.
George Gershwin’s “Concerto in F” holds immense significance in American culture. Composed in 1925, it bridged the gap between classical and popular music, epitomizing the spirit of the Jazz Age.
The concerto showcased Gershwin’s unique ability to blend classical orchestration with jazz-infused rhythms and melodies, captivating audiences and critics alike. It became a symbol of American innovation, reflecting the energy and vitality of a rapidly evolving society. Gershwin’s work not only influenced subsequent American composers but also helped legitimize jazz as a sophisticated art form.
All movements by an early career musician:
Good morning! Yes, I understand what you mean by “servile.” The term “servile” generally refers to cultures or societies that place a strong emphasis on subservience, obedience, and deference to authority figures or those in higher positions. It implies a willingness to serve or obey others without question.
It is essential to approach this topic with cultural sensitivity and avoid making sweeping generalizations. Cultural traits and behaviors can vary widely across different societies, and no culture should be labeled as inherently more “servile” than others.
Cultural norms and attitudes toward authority and hierarchy can be influenced by various factors, such as historical experiences, religious beliefs, social structures, and economic conditions. What might appear as “servile” behavior in one culture could be perceived differently in another culture with a distinct set of values and traditions.
It is crucial to understand and appreciate the diversity of cultures and refrain from applying a single label to any particular group. Each culture has its unique strengths, weaknesses, and complexities that contribute to its distinct identity and societal norms.
The success of individuals in education communities is influenced by a wide range of factors, and being “servile” is not a guarantee of success. Success in education is typically determined by a combination of factors, including but not limited to:
While being obedient or respectful to teachers and authority figures can foster a positive learning environment, being excessively “servile” or submissive might hinder the development of critical thinking and independent problem-solving skills. In modern education systems, there is an increasing emphasis on promoting creativity, collaboration, and critical thinking among students.
Different education systems and cultures have varied approaches to teaching and learning. Some cultures may place a higher value on respecting authority and following rules, while others prioritize individuality and independent thinking. However, the key to success lies in finding a balance between respect for authority and the encouragement of critical thinking and creativity.
Ultimately, success in education depends on a complex interplay of various factors, and no single personality trait or behavior can guarantee success for everyone. Education should aim to foster a well-rounded set of skills and values that empower students to thrive in a diverse and ever-changing world.
The question of whether women are more likely to succeed in the education industry can be complex and context-dependent. Success in the education industry, like any other sector, depends on various factors, such as individual capabilities, qualifications, opportunities, and societal norms. It is important to avoid making generalizations and recognize that success is not determined solely by gender but by a combination of factors.
Historically, women have faced various challenges and barriers in accessing education and pursuing careers in the education industry. However, there has been progress in recent decades, and many women have achieved significant success as educators, administrators, researchers, and leaders in education.
In some cases, women may excel in the education industry due to certain factors, including:
However, it is important to remember that individual success in the education industry is not solely determined by gender but by a combination of talent, dedication, qualifications, and opportunities. Additionally, gender-based biases and stereotypes can still persist, affecting career advancement and opportunities for both men and women in the education industry.
Efforts to promote gender equality and create inclusive environments are essential to ensure that all individuals, regardless of gender, have equal opportunities to succeed in the education industry and other professional fields. Diversity in the education workforce can lead to a richer and more effective learning experience for students of all genders.
As of my last knowledge update in September 2021, it is true that there is a significant presence of individuals of Asian descent and women in the U.S. education industry. The education sector in the United States is known for its diverse workforce, and various studies have shown the increasing representation of Asians and women in teaching, administrative, and leadership roles.
In the teaching profession, Asian Americans have been well-represented, particularly in the fields of mathematics, science, and technology. They have made notable contributions to education and have been recognized for their expertise and dedication to teaching.
Similarly, women have been a dominant force in the U.S. education industry for many years. They hold a majority of teaching positions, especially in early childhood education and elementary schools. However, despite their significant presence in the teaching workforce, women’s representation in administrative and leadership roles has historically been lower than their male counterparts, although this has been changing over time.
Efforts have been made to address gender disparities in leadership positions within the education sector, and there has been a growing recognition of the importance of diversity and gender equality in educational leadership. As a result, more women have been assuming leadership roles in schools, districts, and educational organizations.
It’s important to note that data and statistics can change over time, and the current representation of different groups in the education industry may have evolved since my last update in September 2021. Additionally, there may be variations in representation based on geographical location and specific educational institutions. For the most current and accurate information, it is advisable to refer to more recent reports and studies on the topic.
The impact of the U.S. education industry on individualism and independent thinking is a topic of ongoing debate among educators, scholars, and policymakers. Different stakeholders hold various perspectives on the strengths and weaknesses of the education system.
Some argue that certain aspects of the U.S. education system may place emphasis on conformity and standardized testing, which could potentially limit students’ opportunities for independent thinking and creativity. The focus on test scores and narrow academic measures may lead to a narrower approach to education, emphasizing rote memorization and compliance rather than fostering critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
Others contend that the education system in the U.S. also has strengths in promoting independent thinking and individualism. Many schools and educators actively encourage students to explore their interests, engage in critical analysis, and participate in extracurricular activities that nurture creativity and independent thought.
It’s essential to consider that the U.S. education system is vast and diverse, encompassing public, private, and charter schools, each with its own philosophies and approaches to teaching. Additionally, individual teachers within the system can have a significant influence on students’ intellectual growth and development.
Efforts have been made in recent years to promote more student-centered and inquiry-based learning approaches, which are designed to foster independent thinking and problem-solving skills. Education experts and advocates continue to explore ways to improve the system’s ability to nurture individualism, creativity, and independent thought while maintaining academic standards.
As with any complex system, there are both strengths and weaknesses in the U.S. education industry’s impact on individualism and independent thinking. By recognizing these factors and engaging in ongoing discussions and improvements, educators and policymakers aim to create a balanced and effective education system that prepares students for the challenges of a rapidly changing world.
Inspired by Lord Kelvin’s “If you can not measure it, you can not improve it” and Peter Drucker’s adage “If you can’t measure it, You can’t improve it” and W. Edwards Deming’s counter-argument — “It is wrong to suppose that if you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it – a costly myth.” we present the standards catalog of the Building Owner’s Management Association:
BOMA Area Measurement Standards Timeline 1915-2021
At the moment all titles in this catalog seem to be stabilized although a great deal of economic activity in the commercial real estate market involves adjustment to the circumstances of the pandemic. Largely because a sizeable portion of square footage in every school district, college, university and university-affiliated healthcare research and clinical delivery system derives at least part of its funding from governments at all levels there are workgroups devoted to measuring square footage and documenting its use. For example:
Space Management: University of Oklahoma
Space Management: Texas A&M University-San Antonio
Space Management Policy: University at Buffalo
Getting square-footage right is essential for securing an organization’s sustainability and “green” claims for example. The links in previous posts provide for information about future public consultations.
We maintain the BOMA catalog on the agenda of our Space Planning, Hammurabi and Architectural colloquia, hosted 6 to 8 times annually. See our CALENDAR for the next online meeting, open to everyone.
Posted March 20, 2021
We drill into the specifics commonly found in education communities: sub-lease of space to private industry in publicly-owned facilities. The Building Owners and Managers Association International is an ANSI-accredited consensus standard developer and revised its standard — BOMA Z65.5 Retail Properties: Standard Method of Measurement. Measuring the area of a retail building can quickly become complex when variables must be considered such as ancillary space, mezzanines and storefront lease lines. Many large research universities have long since leased space within many of their building envelopes for private industry to service their communities — student unions, hospitals, dormitories and athletic venues, for example. From the project prospectus:
Z65.5 is intended exclusively for retail properties and their associated structures and may be applied to single-tenant, multi-tenant or multi-building configurations. It features a single method of measurement, with two levels of measurement data, known as Partial Measurement and Overall Measurement for retail properties. It does not measure sidewalks, surface parking, drainage structures, or other ancillary site improvements. This standard is chiefly designed to generate Gross Leasable Area figures, a key metric in retail leasing; however, it also produces area figures which may be of interest to those examining space utilization, valuation, benchmarking, and the allocation of building expenses to various cost centers. The scope of this standard is not intended to be submitted for consideration as an ISO, IEC, or ISO/IEC JTC-1 standard.
Public consultation is open until February 8th.
You may obtain an electronic copy from: [email protected]. Send comments (with optional copy to [email protected]) to: [email protected]. We encourage user-interest subject matter experts in education facility management to participate directly in the BOMA standards development process by communicating directly with Tanner Johnson at BOMA ([email protected]) or 202-326-6357 for more information.
We keep the BOMA catalog on the standing agenda of our colloquia devoted to building construction best practice. See our CALENDAR for the next online meeting; open to everyone.
Issue: [14-117]
Category: Architectural, Facility Asset Management
Colleagues: Jack Janveja, Richard Robben
More
Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education
Posted February, 20 2020
The Building Owners and Managers Association International (BOMA) is an ANSI-accredited consensus standard developer. BOMA has initiated the process of revising its real property measurement standard — BOMA Z65.2 For Industrial Buildings: Standard Methods of Measurement. The primary objectives of this standard are:
– To promote an unambiguous framework for determining the areas of Industrial Buildings with a strong focus on Rentable Area calculations;
– To facilitate transparency and clear communication of building measurement concepts among all participants in the commercial real estate
industry;
– To allow a comparison of values on the basis of a clearly understood and generally agreed upon method of measurement; and
– To align concepts and measurement methodologies with the International Property Measurement Standards: Industrial Buildings (January 2018)
document.
Comments due March 15th
Click here to view these changes in full (Page 2)
Send comments (with optional copy to [email protected]) to: [email protected]
Standards Michigan follows, but d0es not advocate in most of the BOMA standards suite for the following reasons:
We encourage user-interest subject matter experts in education facility management to participate directly in the BOMA standards development process by communicating directly with Tanner Johnson at BOMA ([email protected]) or 202-326-6357 for more information.
We maintain the entire BOMA suite on our periodic Model Building Code colloquia. See our CALENDAR for the next online meeting; open to everyone.
Issue: [15-200]
Category: Architectural, Space Plaaning, Facility Asset Management
Colleagues: Jack Janveja, Richard Robben
LEARN MORE:
Facilities Information Management
Guideline for Square Footage Requirements for Educational Facilities
Guide to School Site Analysis and Development
5.18.20
New update alert! The 2022 update to the Trademark Assignment Dataset is now available online. Find 1.29 million trademark assignments, involving 2.28 million unique trademark properties issued by the USPTO between March 1952 and January 2023: https://t.co/njrDAbSpwB pic.twitter.com/GkAXrHoQ9T
— USPTO (@uspto) July 13, 2023
Standards Michigan Group, LLC
2723 South State Street | Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI 48104 USA
888-746-3670