This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.
This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.
We have resumed our regularly scheduled weekly open agenda teleconferences — a practice begun in 2014 — during which time we sort through the “stream” of public commenting opportunities available to both the academic and business side of the education industry. We display 9 to 18 opportunities for public comment every day that, in our judgement, present an opportunity to reduce #TotalCostofOwnership of the education facilities industry – a $300 billion industry — the largest non-residential building construction market in the United States. These opportunities are presented by about 100 standards development organizations worldwide. We summarize them once per week but are open for discussion every day at 11 AM Eastern time. (Use the login credentials at the upper right of our home page)
As we explain in our ABOUT, participation in consensus and open source standards development provides an opportunity to discover leading practice and to reduce the cost of education by reducing redundancy and destructive competition. Anyone is welcomed to join these teleconferences from your computer, tablet or smartphone with by clicking on the image:
You can also dial in using your phone. United States : +1 (408) 650-3123 Access Code: 718-914-669
We generally review comments on proposals submitted by other user interests as individuals or trade associations, or draft proposals and comments of our own.
We especially encourage user-interest subject matter experts affiliated with the many education industry trade associations to “click in”, mark up and submit comments on the codes and standards we track every day in order to make campuses safer, simpler, lower-cost and longer-lasting (See ABOUT). Subscribers to our mailing list will have access to a detailed agenda and high priority content. Please email bella@standardsmichigan.com for a detailed agenda.
Faculty and students at all levels are also welcome. There is no enterprise on earth that provides the detailed, cross-cutting view of the blistering speed of technical and business standards development; consensus, open-source or consortia. Many organizations in the standards space host competitions for grants and paper-writing. We can walk them through the highlights of successful faculty grants and student-paper winners.
Next open agenda teleconference: December 5th. Note that we meet daily on specific policy, management and technical standards more or less on a daily basis at 11 AM Eastern time. See CALENDAR.
This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.
This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.
This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.
This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.
This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.
A college or university graduate has to acclimate him or herself to the inherited wisdom that lies at the foundation of his or her chosen discipline. To hasten this process before graduation the American National Standards Institute Committee on Education (CoE) hosts an annual competition that awards cash prizes and invitations to its annual conference.
We routinely we reach back into the ANSI CoE library to feature previous winners to provide future competitors examples that might fashion their own entries. Today we feature the first of the two 2013 winners. The topic continues its relevance:
The Role of Standards in Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity
Chris Golden | The Earth Institute and School of Continuing Education, Columbia University
Abstract. This paper will attempt to demonstrate the role that standards play in both preparing for and responding to natural disasters to facilitate recovery operations and minimize disruption of business services. The author draws from his own experience relating to disaster preparedness and response, most recently serving as an environmental, health, and safety (EHS) manager for the Hurricane Sandy recovery effort. At the time of the writing of this paper, organizations lack the technological capacity to prevent a natural disaster. But the impact that a disaster has on an organization can be lessened provided that an organization is adequately prepared and can adapt to a disaster’s operational risks. For the purposes of this paper, the term “organization” can be applied to any entity regardless of size or scope. Examples include, but are not limited to, private businesses, public agencies, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), and communities. Natural disasters are not selective in what types of organizations are affected by their destruction, nor should standards be in providing guidance for their recovery.
The paper, in its entirety, is linked below:
ANSI Student Paper Competition 2013 | First Place Winner
Standards Michigan is not primarily an educational organization despite its origin in one of the largest “cities-within-cities” in the education industry. We are happy to zoom in and out of the “stream” of standards action with students and/or sponsoring faculty any day at 11 AM Eastern time, however. Use the login credentials at the upper right of our home page. You may also communicate directly with the ANSI CoE Secretariat Lisa Rajchel, 212.642.4932, E-mail: lrajchel@ansi.org
The deadline for the 2019 Student Paper Competition is April 30th, 2019
Issue: [12-78]
Category: Academics, Public Policy
Colleagues: Mike Anthony, Christine Fischer, Paul Green
LEARN MORE:
ANSI Announces 2019 Student Paper Competition: “How Do Standards Help Mitigate Disaster?”
ANSI Essential Requirements: Due process requirements for American National Standards
https://www.standardslearn.org/
This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.
Should there be federal legislation for education facility security or can individual states provide an acceptable level of security themselves? This question comes to mind as we follow the rapidly expanding constellation of school security standards, covered here in previous posts:
Each incident spawns questions about the ability of the education industry itself to discove and promulgate leading practice.
What we do know is this: whenever the clam that “academia is involved” no one should assume that academia is a pure “user-interest” as identified in ANSI’s Due Process Requirements or American national standards (effectively the “Constitution” of the private standards development system in the United States) Our experience suggests that in many cases, academia — i.e. faculty — is more closely aligned with incumbent interests such as insurance companies, manufacturers and sometimes compliance and enforcement interests. Compliance and enforcement interests are over-weighted in the education industry, in our view. (One only needs to observe technical committee rosters of standards developers).
Furthermore, once federal agencies step in to clear the market in school security, the voice of incumbent stakeholders are strengthened because incumbents have the resources to advocate directly in the federal government. There will be Federal Register postings for public comment, of course; but an entirely different class of advocates will dominate that discussion if state public safety agencies are found to fall short of the public’s demand for education facility security. They will work through one or more of the hundreds of education industry trade associations; another complicating factor.
Today, we simply post the source material for the possibility that the US education industry — particularly the business side of the education industry which is usually charged with school security — can regulate itself through privately developed standards that can be incorporated by reference into state and local public security laws for our children and colleagues. Keep in mind that this legislation (now over 30 years old) is a due process requirement in itself if the education industry (highly localized) cannot accomplish security on its own.
Key Federal Law and Policy Documents: NTTAA & OMB A-119
Posted June 1, 2018
The U.S. Commerce Department’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) are co-leading the Lab-to-Market Cross Agency Priority goal, part of the recently released President’s Management Agenda(link is external). To accelerate these efforts, NIST has launched an initiative to improve federal technology transfer.
The education industry – particularly large research universities — are likely stakeholders in this discussion – which NIST will expand outside the policy-making precincts of Washington DC. Standards Michigan collaborates with the American National Standards Institute on issues of this nature.
NIST Seeks Public Input to Help Increase Return on Investment from Federal Research https://t.co/LufjfCyqIY #TechTransfer #UnleashingAmericanInnovation #LabtoMarket pic.twitter.com/Xf1dtIjfUp
— NIST (@usnistgov) May 1, 2018
Comments are due July 30th. Ahead of this deadline a series of meetings will be hosted by NIST — both online and on-site — from May 17 through May 31. See the the first page of the Federal Register Notice [Docket Number: 180220199–819–01] for more information.
All NIST activity is on the standing agenda of our weekly Open Door teleconferences; every Wednesday, 11 AM Eastern time which are open to everyone. Click here to log in.
Issue: [18-122]
Category: US Department of Commerce, Public Policy
Colleagues: Mike Anthony, Christine Fischer, Paul Green
Related posts:
New update alert! The 2022 update to the Trademark Assignment Dataset is now available online. Find 1.29 million trademark assignments, involving 2.28 million unique trademark properties issued by the USPTO between March 1952 and January 2023: https://t.co/njrDAbSpwB pic.twitter.com/GkAXrHoQ9T
— USPTO (@uspto) July 13, 2023
Standards Michigan Group, LLC
2723 South State Street | Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI 48104 USA
888-746-3670