Over time, societies have allocated ever more complex objects among users, such as landing slots and radio frequencies. In response, Milgrom and Wilson invented new formats for auctioning off many interrelated objects simultaneously, on behalf of a seller motivated by broad societal benefit rather than maximal revenue. In 1994, the US authorities first used one of their auction formats to sell radio frequencies to telecom operators. Since then, many other countries have followed suit.
“The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid,
and the calf and the young lion and fatling together; and a little child shall lead them.”
— Issiah 11:16
The security of educational communities have had far too many drivers for innovation in security apparatus and amanagement systems in recent years. In addition to tragic headline events, the growth of sporting events as revenue drivers and brand identity support run in the same tributary. Accordingly, we follow action in international electrotechnology standards because, as the Internet of Things rolls out, we find synaptic connection growth happening at warp speed. Products are changing; systems are changing and — of course — software/middleware/firmware is changing.
Templates for safety and sustainability goals are already in consensus products of the Genève sister organizations that support the voluntary consensus-based International Standards system.
Most of the innovation in alarm and electronic security systems is undertaken by multi-national industrial conglomerates with a synergistic relationship with consensus product development administered by the International Electrotechnical Commission. We are routinely on the receiving end of public commenting opportunity presented by IEC Technical Committee 79; its landing page linked below:
Contingent upon setting up a (free) account, the IEC standards development platform is open to the public — i.e. anyone may comment upon an exposure draft.
Since the beginning of 2020 we have reviewed redlines of standards listed below:
– Access control systems;
– Alarm transmission systems;
– Video surveillance systems;
– Combined and/or integrated systems even including fire alarm systems;
– Fire detection and fire alarm systems;
– Intruder and hold-up alarm systems;
– Remote receiving and/or surveillance centres;
– Social alarm systems.
We maintain the work products of this committee on the standing agenda of our Security, Prometheus, Global and Risk colloquia. See our CALENDAR for the next online meeting; open to everyone.
Category: Electrical, Telecommunication, Risk Management, Fire Protection, International
Colleagues: Mike Anthony, Jim Harvey, Kane Howard, Richard Robben
*This workspace was converted (June 10th) to the new Google Sites; recently required by the University of Michigan. We hope for zero, or few bugs in the conversion.
Abstract: Child security in the school campus is most important in building a good society. In and around the world the children are abused and killed also in sometimes by the people those who are not in good attitude in the school campus. To track and resolve such issues an enhanced security feature system is required. Hence in this paper an enhanced version of security system for children is proposed by using `Wearable Sensors’. In this proposed method two wearable sensors nodes such as `Staff Node’ and `Student Node’ are paired by using `Bluetooth’ communication technology and Smart Watch technology is also used to communicate the Security Center or Processing Node for tracking them about their location and whether the two nodes are moved away from the classroom. If the child node is not moving for a long period then it may be notified by the center and they will inform the security officers near to the place. This proposed method may satisfy the need of school management about the staff movements with students and the behavior of students to avoid unexpected issues.
This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send [email protected] a request for subscription details.
New update alert! The 2022 update to the Trademark Assignment Dataset is now available online. Find 1.29 million trademark assignments, involving 2.28 million unique trademark properties issued by the USPTO between March 1952 and January 2023: https://t.co/njrDAbSpwBpic.twitter.com/GkAXrHoQ9T