Vom Abfall zum Dünger
- Home Page 109
loading...
Electronic Equipment Recycling
The Impact of E-Waste / Student Art Guide
We are observers in the development of a new ANSI accredited electronic equipment recycling standard produced with the leadership of NSF International; a Michigan-based standards developer (founded at the University of Michigan) not far from our own offices and one of the largest in the world.
The electronic recycling space is growing quickly — reaching far upstream the value chain into how electronic equipment is designed in the first place. An overview of the project is available in the link below:
Joint Committee on Environmental Leadership Standard for Servers
A public edition is linked below:
This standard moved swiftly to market under NSF International’s continuous maintenance process. We bring it to the attention of the education facilities industry as a recommendation for lowering #TotalCostofOwnership. Participation as a User interest in American national standards development reduces “wheel reinvention” in which many recycling workgroups unnecessarily start from scratch, eliminates the need to attend costly workshops hosted by trade associations and significantly minimizes destructive competition.
This title is on the standing agenda of our Redivivus colloquium. Since our interest lies primarily with electrotechnology we collaborate with the IEEE Standards Association. See our CALENDAR for the next online meeting; open to everyone.
Issue: [14-74], [15-147], [15-148]
Category: Electrical, Telecommunications, Interior
Colleagues: Mike Anthony, Jim Harvey, Richard Robben
Campus District Energy
University of California Merced Power Plant*
District energy plants for campuses are more easily modified over time than built from scratch due to their centralized, modular design and existing infrastructure. These systems, supplying heating, cooling, and sometimes power to multiple buildings, are designed with scalability in mind. District energy plants for campuses are more easily modified over time than built from scratch due to their centralized, modular design and existing infrastructure. These systems, supplying heating, cooling, and sometimes power to multiple buildings, are designed with scalability in mind.
Today at the usual hour we examine the status of best practice literature and prepare responses to relevant public consultations. Use the login credentials at the upper right of our home page.
The following list cites key codes, standards, recommended practices, and guidelines applicable to campus district energy systems, which provide heating, cooling, and sometimes power to multiple buildings. These are widely recognized in the United States and often internationally, ensuring safety, efficiency, and environmental compliance.
-
ASHRAE Standard 90.1 – Energy Standard for Sites and Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings
-
Description: Establishes minimum requirements for energy-efficient design of buildings, including district energy systems for heating and cooling, covering system efficiency, controls, and insulation.
-
Relevance: Ensures campus energy systems meet energy performance benchmarks and optimize thermal distribution.
-
-
ASME B31.1 – Power Piping
-
Description: Governs the design, construction, and maintenance of piping systems for steam, hot water, and other fluids used in district heating systems.
-
Relevance: Applies to high-pressure steam and hot water piping in campus district energy systems.
-
-
NFPA 54/ANSI Z223.1 – National Fuel Gas Code
-
Description: Provides safety requirements for the installation and operation of fuel gas piping systems, appliances, and venting for gas-fired equipment in district energy plants.
-
Relevance: Ensures safe operation of gas-fired boilers or cogeneration systems in campus energy facilities.
-
-
ASHRAE Guideline 0 – The Commissioning Process
-
Description: Outlines a systematic process for commissioning building systems, including district energy systems, to ensure they meet design intent and operational requirements.
-
Relevance: Critical for verifying that campus heating, cooling, and power systems perform as designed.
-
-
International Energy Conservation Code (IECC)
-
Description: Sets energy efficiency requirements for building systems, including district energy systems connected to buildings, focusing on reducing energy waste.
-
Relevance: Guides energy-efficient design and operation of campus-wide heating and cooling networks.
-
-
NFPA 85 – Boiler and Combustion Systems Hazards Code
-
Description: Provides safety standards for the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of boilers and combustion systems used in district energy plants.
-
Relevance: Ensures safe operation of large boilers in campus central plants.
-
-
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC), Section I
-
Description: Governs the design, fabrication, and inspection of boilers used in district energy systems.
-
Relevance: Ensures structural integrity and safety of high-pressure boilers in campus energy systems.
-
-
ASHRAE Standard 188 – Legionellosis: Risk Management for Building Water Systems
-
Description: Provides guidelines for managing Legionella risk in water systems, including cooling towers and hot water systems in district energy setups.
-
Relevance: Critical for maintaining water quality and preventing health risks in campus cooling and heating systems.
-
-
API Recommended Practice 2000 – Venting Atmospheric and Low-Pressure Storage Tanks
-
Description: Offers guidelines for the safe venting of storage tanks used for fuel or other liquids in district energy systems.
-
Relevance: Applies to fuel storage for backup generators or boilers in campus energy plants.
-
-
EPA’s Clean Air Act Regulations (40 CFR Part 60 and 63)
-
Description: Regulates emissions from boilers, engines, and other combustion equipment in district energy systems to ensure compliance with air quality standards.
-
Relevance: Ensures campus energy systems meet federal environmental requirements for emissions control.
-
Additional Notes:
-
Jurisdiction-Specific Codes: Local building codes, such as those based on the International Building Code (IBC) or state-specific amendments, may apply and should be verified for campus projects.
-
Sustainability Guidelines: Guidelines like LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) or ASHRAE’s Building Decarbonization resources may be relevant for campuses pursuing sustainability goals.
-
Verification: Consult local authorities having jurisdiction (AHJs) and campus-specific requirements, as codes may vary by region or institution.
Exploration of the Theory of Electric Shock Drowning
Exploration of the Theory of Electric Shock Drowning
Jesse Kotsch – Brandon Prussak – Michael Morse – James Kohl
Abstract: Drowning due to electric shock is theorized to occur when a current that is greater than the “let go” current passes through a body of water and conducts with the human body. Drowning would occur when the skeletal muscles contract and the victim can no longer swim. It is theorized that the likelihood of receiving a deadly shock in a freshwater environment (such as a lake) is higher than the likelihood in a saltwater environment (such as a marina). It is possible that due to the high conductivity of salt water, the current shunts around the individual, while in freshwater, where the conductivity of the water is lower than that of the human; a majority of the current will travel through the individual. The purpose of this research is to either validate or disprove these claims. To address this, we used Finite Element analysis in order to simulate a human swimming in a large body of water in which electric current has leaked from a 120V source. The conductivity of the water was varied from .005 S/m (pure water) up to 4.8 S/m (salt water) and the current density through a cross sectional area of the human was measured. With this research, we hope to educate swimmers on the best action to take if caught in such a situation.
CLICK HERE to order complete paper.
Swimming Pool Dimensions and Construction
He swims like the art of poetry. pic.twitter.com/rrhMP83DQD
— The Figen (@TheFigen_) July 12, 2025
University of Michigan | Washtenaw County
A standard Olympic-sized swimming pool is defined by the following dimensions:
- Length: 50 meters
- Width: 25 meters
- Depth: A minimum of 2 meters
- Lanes: 10 lanes, each 2.5 meters wide
The total area of the pool is therefore 1,250 square meters, and it holds approximately 2,500 cubic meters (or 2.5 million liters) of water.
The organization that sets the standards for Olympic-sized pools is the Fédération Internationale de Natation (FINA) — now World Aquatics — the governing body for swimming, diving, water polo, synchronized swimming, and open water swimming. FINA establishes the regulations for the dimensions and equipment of competition pools used in international events, including the Olympic Games.
The top ten universities that have produced Olympic champion:
- University of Southern California (USC)
- Stanford University
- University of California, Berkeley (UC Berkeley)
- University of Florida
- University of Texas at Austin
- University of Michigan – Michael Phelps, the most decorated Olympian of all time.
- Indiana University
- Auburn University
- University of Georgia
- University of Arizona
News:
Swimming like a poem …pic.twitter.com/zT2YUVEzoP
— Figen (@TheFigen_) September 21, 2024
Swim Swam: 2024 Pool “Slow” and not setting records
Paris Olympics swimmers noticing pool is ‘slow’
Make architecture powerful again pic.twitter.com/vQCrbT0TLE
— Pepijn Leonard Demortier (@PepijnDemortier) November 24, 2024
Rewind: District Energy
University of California Merced
Lucas Hyman is the co-author of “Sustainable On Site CHP Systems: Design, Construction and Operations” published by McGraw-Hill 2010 ISBN 978-0-07-160317-1, Co-Editor Martin Meckler is a graduate of the University of Michigan. Mike Anthony contributed Chapter 23 — Government Mission Critical – A combined FMECA and time value of money study on Critical Operations Power Systems.
Goss Engineering was one of the engineers for the University of California Merced; the first university campus with an energy infrastructure begun from “scratch”. Here, Lucas offers his insight into the subtle energy economic trade-offs between centralized and de-centralized systems.
LEARN MORE:
Backgrounder from 2007 ASHRAE conference presentation by Goss Engineering: Designing Sustainable CHP Systems
New update alert! The 2022 update to the Trademark Assignment Dataset is now available online. Find 1.29 million trademark assignments, involving 2.28 million unique trademark properties issued by the USPTO between March 1952 and January 2023: https://t.co/njrDAbSpwB pic.twitter.com/GkAXrHoQ9T
— USPTO (@uspto) July 13, 2023
Welcome
Standards Michigan Group, LLC
2723 South State Street | Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI 48104 USA
888-746-3670
DIRECTIONS
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Layout mode
Predefined Skins
Custom Colors
Choose your skin color
Patterns Background
Images Background
error: Content is protected !!
Skip to content