The Classic Root Beer Float

Loading
loading...

Seawolf Grounds

July 22, 2026
mike@standardsmichigan.com
, ,
No Comments

ANCHORAGE WEATHER

University of Alaska System Financial Reports 2024: $1.490B (p. 4)

2026 Summer Projects Impact Maps Projects

Facilities & Campus Services


 

Sydney Laurence | A Golden Afternoon, Mount Mckinley National Park ...

“Mount McKinley, Alaska” | (1923) Sydney Laurence

Special Education

July 22, 2026
mike@standardsmichigan.com
No Comments

The Watson Institute | Allegheny County 412

Here is a list of key Standards Development Organizations (SDOs) and related bodies that develop or maintain facility safety, accessibility, and sustainability standards applicable to K-12 schools, including those serving special education students.  These organizations create voluntary consensus standards, codes, and guidelines. Special education facilities emphasize accessibility (mobility, sensory, etc.), safety (egress, fire protection, security), and sustainability (energy efficiency, indoor air quality, resilience). Many of these standards are adopted into building codes or used as best practices.

  1. International Code Council (ICC)
    Develops the International Building Code (IBC), International Fire Code (IFC), International Mechanical Code, and International Green Construction Code (IgCC).
    Includes provisions for educational occupancies, accessibility (via ICC A117.1), and safety features relevant to special education classrooms.
    Website: www.iccsafe.org
  2. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
    Develops NFPA 101 (Life Safety Code) and NFPA 5000 (Building Construction and Safety Code).
    Covers fire safety, emergency planning, and provisions for occupants with disabilities.
    Website: www.nfpa.org
  3. American National Standards Institute (ANSI)
    Accredits many SDOs and publishes standards like ANSI/ICC A117.1 (Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities).
    Critical for accessibility in special education spaces.
    Website: www.ansi.org
  4. ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers)
    Develops standards for indoor air quality (ASHRAE 62.1), energy efficiency (ASHRAE 90.1), and thermal comfort.
    Highly relevant for healthy learning environments in special education.
    Website: www.ashrae.org
  5. U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) / LEED
    Administers LEED for Schools rating system.
    Focuses on sustainability, energy, water, materials, and indoor environmental quality.
    Website: www.usgbc.org
  6. Collaborative for High Performance Schools (CHPS)
    Develops the CHPS Criteria and rating system specifically for K-12 schools.
    Emphasizes health, safety, accessibility, and sustainability ideal for inclusive/special education environments.
    Website: www.chps.net

Other Notable Organizations and Guidelines

  • International Association of Accessibility Professionals (IAAP) and U.S. Access Board: Develop federal ADA Standards and guidelines for accessible design in schools.
  • ASTM International: Standards for materials, testing, and safety features.
  • Partner Alliance for Safer Schools (PASS): K-12-specific safety and security guidelines.

Additional Context

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) require accessible facilities; these reference the standards above. Many states adopt ICC/NFPA codes with amendments for schools and special education (e.g., universal design, sensory rooms).  U.S. Access Board (ADA), ASTM International, and Partner Alliance for Safer Schools (PASS).

A117.1 Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities

Means of Egress

Life Safety Code

Special Education Resources

July 22, 2026
mike@standardsmichigan.com
No Comments

State of Michigan

Eastern Michigan University streamlines special education program; provides faster path to graduation - EMU Today

§

Four Year Institutions Offering Special Education Programs

  • Eastern Michigan University (EMU, Ypsilanti) — Strong K-12 Special Education BS endorsement programs (multiple categories like Cognitive Impairment, Emotional Impairment, Learning Disabilities). Offers undergraduate and graduate options.

    emich.edu

  • Michigan State University (MSU, East Lansing) — BA in Special Education with elementary certification + Learning Disabilities endorsement.

    education.msu.edu

  • Western Michigan University (WMU, Kalamazoo) — Expedited MA programs and bachelor’s/master’s in areas like Autism Spectrum Disorder, Emotional Impairment, Learning Disabilities.

    wmich.edu

  • Alma College (Alma) — BA in Special Education; expedited programs in Learning Disabilities, Cognitive Impairment, Emotional Impairment. Para-to-Pro pathway.

    alma.edu

  • Central Michigan University (CMU, Mount Pleasant) — Programs for Teachers of Students with Emotional Impairment (and others).

    cmich.smartcatalogiq.com

  • Ferris State University (Big Rapids) — Bachelor’s and master’s in special education (multiple endorsements).

    michigan.gov

  • Oakland University (Rochester) — Special Education endorsements (e.g., Emotional Impairment, Learning Disabilities, Autism).

    mdoe.state.mi.us

  • Wayne State University (Detroit) — Undergraduate/graduate special education with various specializations (Cognitive Impairment, etc.).

    specialeducationguide.com

  • University of Michigan-Flint — BS in Special Education.

    umflint.edu

  • Saginaw Valley State University — BA in Special Education.

    specialeducationguide.com

  • Concordia University (Ann Arbor) — Online options for endorsements (e.g., Learning Disabilities) or initial certification + master’s.

    onlineinfo.cuaa.edu

Others: Grand Valley State University, Northern Michigan University, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor/Dearborn, Madonna University, Spring Arbor University, etc.

Minnehaha County 605

July 22, 2026
mike@standardsmichigan.com
No Comments

vcvcv

Augustana University | Minnehaha County South Dakota

Unified English Braille

July 22, 2026
mike@standardsmichigan.com
, ,
No Comments

 

Electric Vehicle Charging Stations

July 21, 2026
mike@standardsmichigan.com
,
No Comments

Edison electric vehicle | National Park Service, US Department of the Interior

Electrical power engineers know that it is unwise to imagine a totally electric mobility system in the mind’s eye of vertical incumbents, policy makers and trendsniffers.  That does not mean that, as licensed professionals, we cannot positively respond to the demand for more electric mobility on campuses and within school districts.

Today we run through current codes, standards and guides to make that power supply chain safe and sustainable.  Use the login credentials at the upper right of our home page.

In addition to the “NEC canonicals” — listing, coupler heights, disconnect, grounding, voltage, ampacity and overcurrent protection that would likely be applied in a fleet enclosure, more specific passages are relevant when the charging stations are widely dispersed in exterior locations:

Article 225 Outside branch circuits and feeders

Article 625 Electric Vehicle Power Transfer System

We will deal with cable management, IEC 61851 titles, Level 1 & 2 equipment, load management, placement of charging stations at motor fuel dispensing installations and wireless charging systems in a separate session.

2026 National Electrical Code Workspace

NECA 413 Standard For Installing And Maintaining Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment

National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Standards and Requirements

Gallery: Electric Vehicle Fire Risk

Much like designing and building campus outdoor lighting systems, there are more site-related issues to be reckoned with.  For example:

  1. Charging infrastructure: One of the biggest space usage problems with EVs is the need for charging infrastructure. EV owners require access to charging stations in order to recharge their vehicles, and these charging stations can take up valuable space in public areas or campus parking structures that may require additional fire protection systems (that also require upgraded electrotechnologies.
  2. Battery storage: Another space usage issue with EVs is the need for battery storage. EV batteries are large and heavy, and require adequate storage space for safe and secure disposal at the end of their life cycle.
  3. Vehicle size: Many EVs are larger and heavier than traditional gasoline-powered vehicles, which can create space usage problems in urban areas where parking and road space is limited.
  4. Recycling infrastructure: As EVs become more common, the need for specialized recycling infrastructure for EV components, including batteries, motors, and electronics, is likely to increase. These facilities require additional space and resources to safely and efficiently process and recycle these components.

Addressing these space usage problems will require a combination of policy interventions, technological innovations, and public awareness campaigns to promote the benefits and potential of EVs while minimizing their environmental impact and spatial footprint.

Electric Vehicle Energy Management

Electric Vehicle Regulatory Reference Guide

Electric Vehicle Open Charge Point Protocol

Campus Transportation & Parking System Design

IBC Electrical (Outdoor Lighting)

§ 1107.2 Electrical Vehicle Charging Stations

Drivers and Barriers to Implementation of Connected, Automated, Shared, and Electric Vehicles

Standard for Parking Structures

 

2029 National Electrical Code Panel 12

July 21, 2026
mike@standardsmichigan.com
No Comments

Ahead of the September-October First Draft Meetings in Redondo Beach California, we sort through the proposals related to electric vehicle safety and sustainability.

Public Input Report (546 pages)

From our perspective the omissions are probably more interesting than the inclusions:

  • No discussion of maintenance bays servicing high-voltage traction batteries.
  • No discussion of vehicle-to-grid (V2G) installations on campuses; or off-campus housing with merchant utility services.
  • No discussion of shared charging yards used jointly by universities and municipal transit agencies.
  • No discussion of fleet maintenance worker clearances around energized traction systems.

We are spread pretty thin and Mike’s reassignment by IEEE to CMP-3 limits the time for getting topics like these discussed.



We shall see the results of the First Draft meetings. If Standards Michigan – or the IEEE Education & Healthcare Facilities Committee were looking ahead we might consider proposals addressing:

  • Electrical design guidance for large educational fleet charging depots. (An authoritative title pulling together concepts from other standards catalogs)
  • Coordination between Article 625 and school bus maintenance facilities.
  • Service disconnecting and emergency shutdown arrangements for campus charging yards.
  • Arc-flash and maintenance access requirements unique to fleet charging equipment.
  • Load-management systems serving university transportation departments.
  • Cross-references to NFPA 70B for maintenance of campus EV charging infrastructure.
  • Guidance for campuses that operate both transit buses and public charging facilities.

Even if it means submitting proposals to the ICC, ASHRAE, SAE or other standards development organizations.

Campus Micromobility

Molėtai Astronomical Observatory

July 21, 2026
mike@standardsmichigan.com
, , ,
No Comments

Layout mode
Predefined Skins
Custom Colors
Choose your skin color
Patterns Background
Images Background
Standards Michigan
error: Content is protected !!
Skip to content