Energy Management Systems

Loading
loading...

Energy Management Systems

January 1, 2023
mike@standardsmichigan.com
,
No Comments

We follow and participate in about fifty standardization projects administered from the Geneva-sister standards setting organizations; either through the US Technical Advisory Group Administrator assigned by the American National Standards Institute or through colleagues in educational institutions elsewhere in the world; mostly faculty in European colleges and universities engaged in research in electrotechnology.

Since 2013 we have been keeping pace with the product creation of  International Organization for Standardization Technical Committee 301 Energy Management and Energy Savings.  The work of ISO/TC 301 provides a globally recognized standard of practice for managing energy over time and for calculating and reporting energy savings. A key deliverable — ISO 50001 Energy Management — unites, on a broad level, the concept and execution of energy management system standardization for a range of stakeholders, including, but not limited to: industry, buildings, energy efficiency organizations, standards authorities, energy service providers, government agencies, energy management practitioners, and conformance and energy auditing firms.

Link to ISO TC/301 Strategic Business Plan.

Working Area: Energy management and energy savings

Université de Genève

Of particular interest to us back in 2013 were the performance provisions — fairly typical for international standards — for adopting organizations and industries to set their own benchmarks (i.e. agree upon a rate of change, rather than an absolute target).   We monitor about half of the standards action in ANSI accredited standards developers every day and decided to propose references to the work products of ISO TC/301 to US-based standards developers such as ASHRAE International and the International Code Council.  They were rejected for the same reason: US-based standards developers prefer bright-line, prescriptive standards that can be enforced by the conformance and compliance industry.

Good minds will disagree upon whether performance standards promulgated by the Geneva standards-setting organizations are appropriate for all industries.  Performance standards may be appropriate for the energy, manufacturing and financial industries in all nations but they may not meet the rather well-financed energy conservation interests tied to education communities in the United States.  We find many, many energy conservation functionaries in these communities.

The United States and China are Co-Secretariats | Click on image for more information

Georgia Tech Energy & Sustainability Services (GTESS) is the US Technical Advisory Group Administrator for the American National Standards Institute.   We maintain a collaborative workspace with experts in the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers to respond to public consultation queries that originate from either GTESS or our colleagues at other universities in other nations

IEEE Education & Healthcare Facilities Committee

The energy domain is a relatively “crowded domain” in our view; characterized by relative weakness of the User-Interest which we describe in our ABOUT.   In our experience, crowded domains require special sensitivities.


We encourage our colleagues in the energy conservation and sustainability community to communicate directly with Georgia Tech Energy & Environmental Management Center (GTESS); Deann Desai, 75 Fifth Street N.W, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30332-0640, (770) 605-4474, deann.desai@innovate.gatech.edu, OR melody.mcelw ee@innovate.gatech.ed to obtain review copies of these documents and to submit comments (with a copy to psa@ansi.org).  We will collaborate on energy issues separately with our colleagues at other universities in Europe through the IEEE Industrial Applications Society

All international standards that affect #TotalCostofOwnership and the safety and sustainability agenda of the education industry are on the standing agenda of our periodic Global and Energy standards teleconferences.  See our CALENDAR for the next online meeting; open to everyone.

Issue: [13-98]

Category: Energy Management

Colleagues: Mike Anthony, Christine Fischer, Jack Janveja, Richard Robben, Larry Spielvogel


More >>

Technical Conference on Transmission Planning & Cost Management

January 1, 2023
mike@standardsmichigan.com

No Comments

This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.

Cherubic Hymn

January 1, 2023
mike@standardsmichigan.com
,
No Comments

This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.

UNIVERSITY CUSTODIANS SALIENDO ADELANTE AND STUDENT ENGAGEMENT PRACTICES

January 1, 2023
mike@standardsmichigan.com
No Comments

This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.

Evensong “When I Go”

January 1, 2023
mike@standardsmichigan.com
,
No Comments

This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.

Facility Manager Certification

January 1, 2023
mike@standardsmichigan.com

No Comments

This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.

Harry Ransom Center

January 1, 2023
mike@standardsmichigan.com
, ,
No Comments

This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.

Christingle

January 1, 2023
mike@standardsmichigan.com
,
No Comments

This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.

Internet of Things

January 1, 2023
mike@standardsmichigan.com
No Comments

The newest Big Thing — a networked world of connected devices, objects and people — is getting long in the tooth.  It is hazardous to even try to write about the Internet of Things without being complicit in internet triumphalism.   We try to be as specific as possible, to avoid sounding like Jules Verne the futurist, even at the risk of getting too technical to be practical for the front line work force in education communities.   We challenge excess cost starting with small things.

Standards Michigan is a past member of ANSI’s US National Committee to the IEC (USNC/IEC) but now collaborates with the IEEE Education & Healthcare Facilities Committee (E&H) and the IEEE Standards Association on coordinated response to commenting opportunities posted by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on its IoT titles.

IEC Public Comment Home Page

The E&H Committee meets online four times monthly in European and American time zones in which the priorities of the Joint Technical Committee 1 (JTC1) are a standing item on its agenda.  The International Committee for Information Technology Standards  (INCITS) is ANSI’s US Technical Advisory Group Administrator.

Leaders of the US #SmartCampus transformation will have to sort through the competition among them because, at the moment, the blue-sky conception of a #SmartCampus is doing more to drive trade association content and conference revenue than contribute meaningfully to lower costs in education communities.

Université de Genève

We keep pace with standards setting in the IoT transformation with particular interest in the topics listed below:

Cloud

Wireless Sensor Networks

Interoperability (e,g, Z-Wave, Zigbee, Insteon protocols)

Trustworthiness

Pathway Intelligence

Radio spectrum

There are others; all of them with challenges, risks and ethical concerns.

The IEC produces policy templates for national standards bodies and governments.  To workpoint practitioners its products may seem (at first) too “blue-sky” to be practical.   The IEC consensus products are far more “finely sliced” (think prosciutto) than US consensus products such as the National Electrical Code.   You will see this reflected in the Call for Public Comment in our INCITS posts.

We are happy to explain the difference between speculative hype and meaningful technical specifics that show up on future campus construction, operation and maintenance balances sheets to anyone any day at 11 AM Eastern time.  We also sweep through commenting opportunities every month during our Global standards teleconference and four times per month with the IEEE E&H Committee.  See our CALENDAR for the next online meetings; open to everyone.

Issue: [Various]

Category: Electrical, Telecommunication, Informatics, International, #SmartCampus

Colleagues: Mike Anthony, Jim Harvey, Massimo Mittolo, Giuseppe Parise

IEC | USNA/IEC Workspace


LEARN MORE:

IEC Area: 741: Internet of Things (IoT)   

Layout mode
Predefined Skins
Custom Colors
Choose your skin color
Patterns Background
Images Background
error: Content is protected !!
Skip to content