Electric Vehicle Charging Stations

Loading
loading...

Electric Vehicle Charging Stations

August 14, 2023
mike@standardsmichigan.com
,
No Comments

Edison electric vehicle | National Park Service, US Department of the Interior

Electrical power engineers know that it is unwise to imagine a totally electric mobility system in the mind’s eye of vertical incumbents, policy makers and trendsniffers.  That does not mean that, as licensed professionals, we cannot positively respond to the demand for more electric mobility on campuses and within school districts.

Today we run through current codes, standards and guides to make that power supply chain safe and sustainable.  Use the login credentials at the upper right of our home page.

In addition to the “NEC canonicals” — listing, coupler heights, disconnect, grounding, voltage, ampacity and overcurrent protection that would likely be applied in a fleet enclosure, more specific passages are relevant when the charging stations are widely dispersed in exterior locations:

Article 225 Outside branch circuits and feeders

Article 625 Electric Vehicle Power Transfer System

We will deal with cable management, IEC 61851 titles, Level 1 & 2 equipment, load management, placement of charging stations at motor fuel dispensing installations and wireless charging systems in a separate session.

2026 National Electrical Code Workspace

NECA 413 Standard For Installing And Maintaining Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment

National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Standards and Requirements

Gallery: Electric Vehicle Fire Risk

Much like designing and building campus outdoor lighting systems, there are more site-related issues to be reckoned with.  For example:

  1. Charging infrastructure: One of the biggest space usage problems with EVs is the need for charging infrastructure. EV owners require access to charging stations in order to recharge their vehicles, and these charging stations can take up valuable space in public areas or campus parking structures that may require additional fire protection systems (that also require upgraded electrotechnologies.
  2. Battery storage: Another space usage issue with EVs is the need for battery storage. EV batteries are large and heavy, and require adequate storage space for safe and secure disposal at the end of their life cycle.
  3. Vehicle size: Many EVs are larger and heavier than traditional gasoline-powered vehicles, which can create space usage problems in urban areas where parking and road space is limited.
  4. Recycling infrastructure: As EVs become more common, the need for specialized recycling infrastructure for EV components, including batteries, motors, and electronics, is likely to increase. These facilities require additional space and resources to safely and efficiently process and recycle these components.

Addressing these space usage problems will require a combination of policy interventions, technological innovations, and public awareness campaigns to promote the benefits and potential of EVs while minimizing their environmental impact and spatial footprint.

Electric Vehicle Energy Management

Electric Vehicle Regulatory Reference Guide

Electric Vehicle Open Charge Point Protocol

Campus Transportation & Parking System Design

International Building Code Electrical

§ 1107.2 Electrical Vehicle Charging Stations

Drivers and Barriers to Implementation of Connected, Automated, Shared, and Electric Vehicles

Standard for Parking Structures

 

Chores

August 12, 2023
mike@standardsmichigan.com

No Comments

CLICK IMAGE

Living off-campus provides students with autonomy, independence, and lower costs, but it also requires greater responsibility and may present challenges such as commuting time, social isolation, and safety concerns about the property itseld.  We provide direct access to a widely reference standard of care with specific passages about heating, cooling, plumbing electrical systems

Benefits:

  1. More freedom and independence: Off-campus housing can provide students with more autonomy and independence than living on-campus. Students can choose their own roommates, decorate their own space, and set their own rules.
  2. Lower costs: In some cases, off-campus housing can be more affordable than on-campus housing. Students may be able to find lower rent prices or split costs with roommates.
  3. More space: Off-campus housing may offer more living space than on-campus housing, allowing students to spread out and feel more comfortable.
  4. Opportunity to learn life skills: Living off-campus can help students develop important life skills, such as budgeting, grocery shopping, cooking, and maintaining a household.
  5. More privacy: Living off-campus can offer more privacy than on-campus housing, allowing students to have more control over their living environment and social interactions.

Costs:

  1. Commuting time and expense: Living off-campus may require a longer commute to classes, which can be time-consuming and costly. Students may need to pay for transportation or purchase a car.
  2. Greater responsibility: Living off-campus requires greater responsibility and independence than living on-campus. Students must manage their own bills, maintenance, and household tasks.
  3. Social isolation: Living off-campus may make it harder for students to connect with their peers and participate in campus activities. They may feel more isolated or disconnected from the college community.
  4. Greater risk of safety concerns: Living off-campus can increase the risk of safety concerns, such as crime, accidents, and emergencies. Students may need to take extra precautions to ensure their own safety.
  5. Difficulty with roommate relationships: Off-campus housing can strain roommate relationships due to the greater responsibility and shared living arrangements. Conflicts over finances, cleaning, and social activities can arise and be harder to manage.


Strawberries

August 12, 2023
mike@standardsmichigan.com
,
No Comments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The University strawberry breeding program began in 1948 under the direction of plant pathologist Albert Brooks at a Florida Agricultural Experiment Station (FAES) Center near Plant City.

The first cultivar, ‘Florida Ninety,’ was released in 1952 and became the dominant variety grown in Florida. At the time, it was known for its high yields and moderately-high degree of resistance to crown rot. Subsequent breeding efforts were sporadic until 1968 when Charlie Howard began a systematic process for crossing and selection at the Gulf Coast Research and Education Center that continues to this day.

‘FloridaBelle’ was released in 1975, followed by ‘Dover’ in 1979. Both varieties showed improved yield and resistance to crown rot, but they suffered from fruit-quality problems. ‘Sweet Charlie,’ released in 1992, produced higher yields from December through February than any other available variety, and it was the only Central Florida variety that was resistant to anthracnose fruit rot.

University of Florida Plant Breeding

Nourriture Printemps

Standards Florida

Quadrivium: Architecture and Aesthetic Education

August 11, 2023
mike@standardsmichigan.com
, , ,
No Comments

This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.

An Evening with Bill Evans

August 11, 2023
mike@standardsmichigan.com
No Comments

This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.

Increasing energy efficiency in bakery ovens

August 11, 2023
mike@standardsmichigan.com
, ,
No Comments

 

Increasing energy efficiency of the gases production process in bakery ovens

Chelmenciuc Corina | Thermal Power Engineering and Energetics Management Department

Technical University of Moldova

Abstract.  The current work presents the solution of increasing energy efficiency of the processes of obtaining gases, used as heat carrier for baking processes in tunnel type ovens, by integration of cogeneration. A comparative energetic analysis was carried out between the processes of obtaining gases in bakery ovens and those with integrated cogeneration. The evaluation of energy efficiency, of the proposed technical solution, is based on drawing up the energy balance of processes, the one with gases production in the combustion chamber of classic bakery oven and that of the internal combustion engine. The evaluation of energy efficiency of the classical gas production process in the tunnel type oven is based on experimental data whereas the efficiency of method proposed in this work is based on theoretical data. The energetic analysis was performed in order to demonstrate that the integration of a cogeneration installation in bakery ovens contribute to reducing losses in the processes of obtaining gases, thus increasing the energy efficiency.

CLICK HERE to order complete paper

 

 

Layout mode
Predefined Skins
Custom Colors
Choose your skin color
Patterns Background
Images Background
error: Content is protected !!
Skip to content