Facilities Management Campus Planning | University of Colorado Net Position 2023: $9.661B
vv
Blended Burger
- Home Page 23
loading...
Naming & Signs
Most educational settlements are not overloaded by signage by design but distracted management (overlapping temporary signs, inconsistent styles) or large footprints supports the perception. Today at the usual hour we explore the literature covering exterior and interior signage with emphases on coherence and necessity.
ANSI Z535.2-2023: Environmental and Facility Safety Signs
Consistency with Institutional Branding
- Signage must align with the educational institution’s brand identity, including logos, colors, and typography (e.g., Helvetica font is often specified, as seen in some university standards).
- Corporate logos are typically prohibited on primary exterior signage to maintain institutional focus.
Compliance with Local Zoning and Building Codes
- Signs must adhere to municipal zoning regulations, which dictate size, height, placement, and illumination (e.g., NYC Building Code Appendix H or similar local codes).
- Permits may be required, and signage must not obstruct traffic visibility or pedestrian pathways.
ADA Accessibility Requirements
- Exterior signs identifying permanent spaces (e.g., entrances or exits) must meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards, including visual character requirements (legible fonts, sufficient contrast).
- Tactile signs with Braille are required at specific locations like exit stairways or discharge points, per the U.S. Access Board guidelines, though not all exterior signs need to be tactile.
Wayfinding and Identification Functionality
- Signs should clearly identify buildings, provide directional guidance, and include essential information (e.g., building names, departments, or campus districts).
- Placement is typically near main entrances, limited to one per building unless otherwise justified.
Material and Durability Standards
- Materials must be weather-resistant and durable (e.g., extruded or cast aluminum with finishes like natural or dark bronze, avoiding plastic in some cases).
- Maintenance considerations ensure longevity and legibility over time.
Size and Placement Restrictions
- Size is often regulated (e.g., no larger than necessary for legibility, with some institutions capping temporary signs at 32 square feet).
- Placement avoids upper building portions unless in urban settings or campus peripheries, ensuring aesthetic harmony.
Approval and Review Processes
- Exterior signage often requires review by a campus design or sign committee (e.g., a university’s Design Review Board).
- For partnerships or donor-funded buildings, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) may govern signage rights and standards.
Safety and Visibility Standards
- Signs must not create hazards (e.g., minimum clearance of 7.5 feet above walkways, no sharp edges).
- Illumination, if allowed, must comply with safety codes and enhance visibility without causing glare or distraction.
Temporary Signage Regulations
- Temporary signs (e.g., banners or construction signs) have time limits (e.g., 30-90 days per year) and must be approved, with size and frequency restrictions. The National Electrical Code Article 590 covers temporary wiring for festoon illumination and defines “temporary” as 90 days.
Somewhat Related:
Before CAD, Architect wrote like this. A handwriting everyone could understand. pic.twitter.com/dYyIJMNsOx
— LMD (Arc.) (@Layemie001) June 14, 2026
University of Michigan Naming Policy Guideline
Michigan State University: Building and Facilities Naming
University of Buffalo Naming Guidelines
University of Vienna: Analyzing wayfinding processes in the outdoor environment
Pax Americana
“Appalachian Spring” Aaron Copland
University of Maryland School of Musichttps://t.co/IJK62tCUaW@TerpsMusic@UofMaryland pic.twitter.com/sPsuSOiG6r— Standards Michigan (@StandardsMich) April 3, 2021
“Appalachian Spring” | 1944 Aaron Copland @SydneyCamerata
print(“Lunch Hour 1600 UTC”)\n weekday(2)
print(“American Standard”)https://t.co/9822ixJIr7 pic.twitter.com/KE7vsYZ5p6— Standards Michigan (@StandardsMich) March 22, 2023
7th Edition (2018): Geometric Design of Highways & Streets
Michigan State University
The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials is a standards setting body which publishes specifications, test protocols, and guidelines that are used in highway design and construction throughout the United States. Despite its name, the association represents not only highways but air, rail, water, and public transportation as well. Its technical committees are responsible for route numbering recommendations.
Although AASHTO sets transportation standards and policy for the United States as a whole, AASHTO is not an agency of the federal government; rather it is an organization of the states themselves. Policies of AASHTO are not federal laws or policies, but rather are ways to coordinate state laws and policies in the field of transportation.
One of its consensus products — the so-called “Green Book” — is heavily referenced in campus design guidelines and construction contracts because most education communities exist within municipal infrastructure. Power, water supply, sewers to schools and campuses large and small all tend to follow transportation pathways. The Green Book is revised periodically, the 2018 Edition the most recent.
SUMMARY OF KEY REVISIONS AND UPDATES
We do not advocate in this product at the moment but follow the movement in concepts relevant to education communities; notably the recent reorganization that emphasizes transportation of people, rather than focusing primarily on moving vehicles. A new chapter discusses multimodal level of service and puts greater emphasis on lower-speed, walkable, urban zones in which new mobility technologies are emerging (such as micro-scooters on campuses)
We maintain the AASHTO catalog on our Pathways, Zoning and Mobility colloquia. See our CALENDAR for the next online meeting, open to everyone.
EXTERIOR SIGNAGE, GRAPHICS & WAYFINDING STANDARDS
CAMPUS PLANNING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | December 2024 Revision
University of Wisconsin | Dane County
American universities are plagued by excessive, cluttered signage — “oversigning” — that creates visual chaos and an unwelcoming aesthetic. This is a direct result of strong social control tendencies in modern campus culture and bureaucracy.
Key causes:
- Risk aversion & liability: Administrators flood spaces with warning signs, rules, accessibility notices, and compliance statements to minimize lawsuits.
- Administrative bloat: Expanding offices (DEI, compliance, student life, bias teams) create endless new policies that each demand signage.
- Behavioral control: Signage increasingly prescribes speech, pronouns, microaggression warnings, approved behaviors, and ideological signals.
- Bureaucratic inertia: Poor coordination between departments leads to overlapping, redundant, and rarely removed signs.
The outcome is visual overload: too many fonts, colors, rules, and directives. While signage standards try to impose order, the underlying incentives of safetyism, compliance, and norm enforcement continually push toward more signs, not fewer.
The University Campus As A Designed Work and an Artefact of Cultural Heritage
Paul Hardin Kapp
School of Architecture, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, United States
ABSTRACT: The university campus in the United States is a unique architectural and landscape architecture typology. Nothing like it existed until Harvard University was established in 1638. Invented during in the 17th century by the American colonists and later developed during the American Industrial Revolution, the American campus is a community devoted to teaching and generating knowledge. It can be urban, suburban, and/or rural in form and its planning directly correlates with a university’s research mission and the pedagogy of the American university system. Its buildings and landscapes are embedded with iconography, which the founding builders used to convey their values to future generations.
This paper presents the history of how this designed work first emerged in American society and then evolved in ways that responded to changes that occurred in America. At the end of the 20th century, universities conserved parts of them as cultural heritage monuments. Originally, the university campus was built to disseminate a classical education, but later, the campus was built for technical and agricultural education. By the beginning of the 20th century, professional education and sport changed its architecture and landscape. The paper briely discusses that while it has inspired how universities are built to teach and generate knowledge throughout the world. It concludes by reairming its value to cultural heritage and that it should be conserved.
Life Safety Code
Today at the usual hour we sort through the NFPA stack for fire safety system aspects during renovation, alteration, or rehabilitation of buildings. Two sections come to mind:
Chapter 43 (NFPA 101): Building Rehabilitation
NFPA 241: Safeguarding Construction, Alteration, and Demolition Operations
Use the login credentials at the upper right of our home page.
Educational and Day-Care Occupancies (July 23, 2025 Second Draft Transcript)
The Life Safety Code addresses those construction, protection, and occupancy features necessary to minimize danger to life from the effects of fire, including smoke, heat, and toxic gases created during a fire. It is widely incorporated by reference into public safety statutes; typically coupled with the consensus products of the International Code Council. It is a mighty document — one of the NFPA’s leading titles — so we deal with it in pieces; consulting it for decisions to be made for the following:
(1) Determination of the occupancy classification in Chapters 12 through 42.
(2) Determination of whether a building or structure is new or existing.
(3) Determination of the occupant load.
(4) Determination of the hazard of contents.
There are emergent issues — such as active shooter response, integration of life and fire safety systems on the internet of small things — and recurrent issues such as excessive rehabilitation and conformity criteria and the ever-expanding requirements for sprinklers and portable fire extinguishers with which to reckon. It is never easy telling a safety professional paid to make a market for his product or service that it is impossible to be alive and safe. It is even harder telling the dean of a department how much it will cost to bring the square-footage under his stewardship up to the current code.
The 2021 edition is the current edition and is accessible below:
NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Free Public Access
Public input on the 2027 Revision will be received until June 4, 2024. Public comment on the Second Draft 2027 Revision will be received until March 31, 2026.
Since the Life Safety Code is one of the most “living” of living documents — the International Building Code and the National Electric Code also move continuously — we can start anywhere and anytime and still make meaningful contributions to it. We have been advocating in this document since the 2003 edition in which we submitted proposals for changes such as:
• A student residence facility life safety crosswalk between NFPA 101 and the International Building Code
• Refinements to Chapters 14 and 15 covering education facilities (with particular attention to door technologies)
• Identification of an ingress path for rescue and recovery personnel toward electric service equipment installations.
• Risk-informed requirement for installation of grab bars in bathing areas
• Modification of the 90-minute emergency lighting requirements rule for small buildings and for fixed interval testing
• Modification of emergency illumination fixed interval testing
• Table 7.3.1 Occupant Load revisions
• Harmonization of egress path width with European building codes
There are others. It is typically difficult to make changes to stabilized standard though some of the concepts were integrated by the committee into other parts of the NFPA 101 in unexpected, though productive, ways. Example transcripts of proposed 2023 revisions to the education facility chapter is linked below:
Chapter 14 Public Input Report: New Educational Occupancies
Educational and Day Care Occupancies: Second Draft Public Comments with Responses Report
Since NFPA 101 is so vast in its implications we list a few of the sections we track, and can drill into further, according to client interest:
Chapter 3: Definitions
Chapter 7: Means of Egress
Chapter 12: New Assembly Occupancies
Chapter 13: Existing Assembly Occupancies
Chapter 16 Public Input Report: New Day-Care Facilities
Chapter 17 Public Input Report: Existing Day Care Facilities
Chapter 18 Public Input Report: New Health Care Facilities
Chapter 19 Public Input Report: Existing Health Care Facilities
Chapter 28: Public Input Report: New Hotels and Dormitories
Chapter 29: Public Input Report: Existing Hotels and Dormitories
Chapter 43: Building Rehabilitation
Annex A: Explanatory Material
As always we encourage front-line staff, facility managers, subject matter experts and trade associations to participate directly in the NFPA code development process (CLICK HERE to get started)
NFPA 101 is a cross-cutting title so we maintain it on the agenda of our several colloquia —Housing, Prometheus, Security and Pathways colloquia. See our CALENDAR for the next online meeting; open to everyone.
Issue: [18-90]
Category: Fire Safety, Public Safety
Colleagues: Mike Anthony, Josh Elvove, Joe DeRosier, Marcelo Hirschler
More
When lives are at stake, alternative approaches are welcome. #LifeSafety #AlternativeApproaches #Code #NFPA101 @NFPA
https://t.co/JvWyyZtuLP— ANSI (@ansidotorg) December 20, 2018
Wayfinding
Modelling and Simulation Wayfinding in Unfamiliar Campus Environment
Designing digital signage for better wayfinding performance: New visitors’ navigating campus of university
Emergency Evacuation From a Teaching Building Based on The Social Force Model
Next-Generation “EXIT” Signs to Save Lives
Evolutionary Game of Emergency Evacuation After an Earthquake at a University: How to Promote Orderly Evacuation
An IoT-based Emergency Evacuation System
Evaluation of a high efficiency boost stage to supply a permanent LED emergency lighting system
GoFAST: A Group-Based Emergency Guiding System with Dedicated Path Planning for Mobile Users Using Smartphones
Mobility-Aware and Congestion-Relieved Dedicated Path Planning for Group-Based Emergency Guiding Based on Internet of Things Technologies
Wayfinding Behavior Detection by Smartphone
Human Behavior During Emergency Evacuation: Cell Transmission Model
Almawhere 2.0: a pervasive system to facilitate indoor wayfinding
Managing egress of crowd during infrastructure disruption
A Fuzzy-Theory-Based Cellular Automata Model for Pedestrian Evacuation From a Multiple-Exit Room
Emergency exit sign detection system for visually impaired people
Evacuating Routes in Indoor-Fire Scenarios with Selection of Safe Exits on Known and Unknown Buildings Using Machine Learning
Exits choice based on cellular automaton model for pedestrians’ evacuation
Computer aided architectural design: Wayfinding complexity analysis
Using space syntax to understand knowledge acquisition and wayfinding in indoor environments
Wayfinding by auditory cues in virtual environments
Computer Vision Method in Means of Egress Obstruction Detection
Map Displays And Landmark Effects On Wayfinding In Unfamiliar Environments
Informing the design of an automated wayfinding system for individuals with cognitive impairments
Virtual Reality to Study Pedestrian Wayfinding: Motivations and an Experiment on Usability
AR-enabled wayfinding kiosk
Research on the terrain cognition in small-scale environment
A comparison study of stationary and mobile eye tracking on EXITs design in a wayfinding system
CityGuide: A Seamless Indoor-Outdoor Wayfinding System for People With Vision Impairments
Poster: Evaluation of Wayfinding Aid Techniques in Multi-Level Virtual Environments
Automatic Optimization of Wayfinding Design
Implementing game artificial intelligence to decision making of agents in emergency egress
Navigating MazeMap: Indoor human mobility, spatio-logical ties and future potential
Energy conservation from retrofit ‘exit‘ sign in public premises
British High Schoolers Try American Fried Chicken, Biscuits & Sausage Gravy
Biscuits and sausage gravy is firmly rooted in Southern American cuisine, which has a rich history influenced by African, Native American, European, and other culinary traditions. The combination of biscuits and sausage gravy reflects the availability of ingredients in the South, where biscuits (similar to a type of British scone) and pork products were common.
The concept of biscuits, similar to what Americans call biscuits, has British origins. Early settlers brought this baking technique with them to the American colonies. However, the American biscuit evolved over time to become lighter and fluffier compared to the denser British biscuit.
I just need everyone to know that for our last stop in Lexington, we did a gravy flight. That’s right, a gravy flight. pic.twitter.com/9sUBanlKt5
— Dr. Molly B. Atkinson (@MollyBAtkinson) August 2, 2024
American Highschoolers try REAL British food for the first time!
Meet Raley Kirk from San Saba, TX. Raising hair sheep and Spanish goats in the Texas Hill Country, Raley is proud to play a part in providing the food and fiber our country depends on every day.
For her, National Ag Week is about highlighting that meaningful work and ensuring… pic.twitter.com/9KKC4pzRgC
— Dept. of Agriculture (@USDA) March 19, 2026
Late Night Breakfast | May
Late Night Breakfast (December & May)
ProPublica: Statement of Financial Position | Capital Master Plan
Students from #myRWU’s Freedom by Design club built a brand-new gatehouse for Bristol Town Beach! Their brilliant design, blending safety measures with historical details, displays their passion for community involvement and real-world learning. 🤝💙
➡️ https://t.co/jvCcO21wr0 pic.twitter.com/FbLCNNPATh
— Roger Williams University (@myrwu) April 16, 2024
New update alert! The 2022 update to the Trademark Assignment Dataset is now available online. Find 1.29 million trademark assignments, involving 2.28 million unique trademark properties issued by the USPTO between March 1952 and January 2023: https://t.co/njrDAbSpwB pic.twitter.com/GkAXrHoQ9T
— USPTO (@uspto) July 13, 2023
Welcome
Standards Michigan Group, LLC
2723 South State Street | Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI 48104 USA
888-746-3670
DIRECTIONS
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Layout mode
Predefined Skins
Custom Colors
Choose your skin color
Patterns Background
Images Background
error: Content is protected !!
Skip to content