This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.
“Chanson de Matin” is characterized by its light, lyrical, and charming melody, which evokes a sense of freshness and optimism associated with the early hours of the day. Elgar is known for his ability to capture various moods and emotions in his compositions.
Anderson University School of Music, Theater, and Dance
Physical Plant | Anderson University
🟠⚫SCHOLARSHIP ALERT
Learn more about our Christian High School and Homeschool scholarship by clicking this link:https://t.co/LTMbl9WfNT pic.twitter.com/GEEr4i1xkv
— Anderson University (@AndersonU) February 13, 2025
The station was established in 1977, long before the advent of internet radio, with the goal of providing students a platform for creative expression, entertainment, and community involvement. Initially, it operated as a small, pirate-style radio station, broadcasting on a limited basis to the university campus. It mainly aired music and student-related content. Over time, the station evolved to include news, talk shows, and interviews, becoming an important part of student life and a voice for the university community.
In the early 1980s, after gaining recognition, the station was granted a temporary Restricted Service Licence (RSL) by Ofcom. This allowed it to broadcast legally on an official frequency for short periods. During this time, the station used various FM frequencies, with the exact frequency changing depending on licensing terms and specific broadcast periods.
In the 1990s, ABER Radio received an official license, enabling it to expand its reach and professionalize its operations. With this transition, the station began broadcasting online, offering a diverse range of programming from music and entertainment to news and current affairs. It also provided students with valuable experience in radio production, journalism, and broadcasting.
Our academics are set to test the gut health benefits of a seaweed extract as part of efforts to improve the nation’s health.
More: https://t.co/BHefU6dzzy pic.twitter.com/O1g0HuBqxX
— Aberystwyth University (@AberUni) January 2, 2025
✍️ Our Centre for Creativity & Wellbeing is running a ‘Marginalised Writers TakeOver Day’ on Saturday 13 July to empower marginalised writers to make their voices heard.
@AberEnglishDept @Durre_Shahwar @Grace_Quantock @isabeladonis @nothumanhead pic.twitter.com/KO0ufbsNc7
— Aberystwyth University (@AberUni) June 27, 2024
Related:
“I’m probably the only person who actually remembers pirate radio” — Bill Nighyhttps://t.co/prxB5e9Hy6 pic.twitter.com/0yO4rUtGbg
— Standards Michigan (@StandardsMich) March 22, 2024
Defining “accepted good practice” (or closely related terms like “good engineering practice,” “recognized and generally accepted good engineering practice” (RAGAGEP), or “accepted good practice for the given local conditions”) in electrical engineering standards is inherently challenging. Standards bodies (e.g., IEEE/NESC, NFPA/NEC, IEC, UL) often use these phrases as a flexible benchmark for safety, design, installation, and maintenance when specific rules do not apply, or as the foundation for the standards themselves.
Here are some of the particular problems that arise in trying to define and apply it consistently:Subjectivity and ambiguity in the definition: The term is rarely defined with precision in codes. It relies on professional judgment, expert consensus, and “what is generally accepted” at a given time, which can lead to disputes among engineers, authorities having jurisdiction (AHJs), regulators, or courts. For example, NESC Rule 012 (and similar clauses) explicitly falls back to “accepted good practice for the given local conditions” for any situation not specifically covered, creating a circular or open-ended reference point.
Rapid technological evolution outpacing standards: Electrical engineering advances quickly (e.g., widespread EVs, renewables integration, smart grids, arc-flash mitigation, or digital protection systems), but consensus-based standards update slowly (often on 3–6 year cycles). New techniques may not yet be “accepted,” while legacy practices embedded in older equipment can become obsolete or non-compliant under current interpretations, even if they met the standard at the time of installation.
Jurisdictional, regional, and international variations: What counts as good practice differs across borders or even within a country (e.g., NEC for building interiors vs. NESC for utility supply/communications lines; ANSI/NFPA vs. IEC). Local conditions (climate, soil, usage patterns) are explicitly factored in, making a universal definition impractical and leading to harmonization difficulties in global supply chains or cross-border projects.
Consensus development process limitations: Standards are created by committees representing utilities, manufacturers, regulators, and users, which can result in compromises, delays, or exclusion of innovative (but not yet widespread) practices. This process itself defines “accepted” practice, but it may lag behind actual field innovations or favor minimum requirements over optimal ones.
Conflicts between overlapping or hierarchical sources: Engineers must navigate multiple layers—mandatory codes (NEC/NESC), recommended practices (IEEE “Color Books”), manufacturer guidelines, internal utility standards, and non-consensus documents. Deciding which takes precedence, or whether a practice must be “recognized” (widely adopted) versus merely “good,” creates practical confusion. “Shall” (mandatory) vs. “should” (recommended) language adds further interpretive gray areas.
Legal, liability, and enforcement challenges: In regulatory audits, incident investigations, or product-liability cases, proving (or disproving) adherence to an ill-defined standard can be difficult. OSHA, for instance, treats RAGAGEP as a performance-based benchmark in process safety, but determining it for older equipment or non-consensus practices requires case-by-case analysis. This is compounded by the fact that codes are often minimum requirements, not necessarily “best” practice.
Trade-offs between safety, cost, reliability, and innovation: Good practice must balance competing priorities (e.g., selective coordination for emergency systems vs. arc-flash hazards, or added costs for enhanced grounding/EMI protection). Defining it objectively is hard when economic or practical constraints vary by project.
While phrases like “accepted good practice” provide essential flexibility in electrical standards, their vagueness, dependence on context, and the dynamic nature of the field make them difficult to pin down uniformly. Practitioners typically resolve this through engineering judgment, reference to interpretations (e.g., IEEE NESC interpretations), peer review, or consultation with AHJs.
"Appalachian Spring" | 1944 Aaron Copland @SydneyCameratahttps://t.co/z4wMEmbtOdhttps://t.co/ektDJAAEWZ pic.twitter.com/M8RadfCSYA
— Standards Michigan (@StandardsMich) March 22, 2026
I hear it in the deep heart’s core.
— William Butler Yeats
Today we walk through literature governing the safety and sustainability of the open space features of education community estates. Unlike the titles for the building envelope, which are known to most design professionals and contractors, the standards for grounds and landscaping are widely scattered; many of them occupational safety related; created, administered and enforced by units of government.
Bucolia 100. We present a broad overview of the dominant standards catalogs incorporated by reference into public safety and sustainability legislation.
Bucolia 200. We drill into technical specifics of the titles in Bucolia 100.
Bucolia 400. We pick through case studies in landscape, garden, tree and water literature. We also track titles about the reclamation of building roofs for permeable surfaces and gardens.
During the winter months (Bucolia 200) in the northern hemisphere we include snow and ice management; while covering summer month technologies for southern hemisphere (and vice-versa). Snowfalls in the southern hemisphere are mainly contained to the highlands and mountain ranges, which are almost exclusively in Victoria and Southern New South Wales, as well as the mountains in Tasmania. Winter does not pose as much of a cost burden to education facilities in the southern hemisphere as it does in the northern hemisphere.
|
Landscape standards refer to guidelines or regulations that specify the requirements for the design, installation, and maintenance of outdoor spaces such as parks, gardens, streetscapes, and public spaces. Landscape standards typically cover various aspects of landscape design, including vegetation selection, planting arrangements, irrigation systems, hardscape materials, and lighting. These standards may be set by government agencies at the federal, state, or local level, or by professional organizations such as the American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA). Landscape standards aim to ensure that outdoor spaces are safe, functional, and aesthetically pleasing while also promoting sustainability and environmental protection. Landscape standards may also address issues such as accessibility for people with disabilities, water conservation, stormwater management, and erosion control. They may vary depending on the specific location, climate, and intended use of the outdoor space. Compliance with landscape standards may be required for approval of development projects, public funding, or other permits. |
We track the standards catalog of two ANSI-accredited standards developers:
Tree Care Industry Association
Additional practice titles applicable to accessory systems:
ASABE/ICC 802 Landscape Irrigation Sprinkler and Emitter Standard
ASHRAE 90.1 Energy Standard for Sites and Buildings
Golf Course Superintendents Association of America
National Electrical Code: Article 411 Low-Voltage Lighting
National Electrical Code: Article 225: Outside Branch Circuits and Feeders
Illumination Engineering Society (Lighting Library)
Land F/X: Landscape Lighting, Codes, Guidelines and Techniques
OSHA Landscape and Horticultural Services
Sports Turf Managers Association
As a cross-cutting subjectSports Turf Managers Association ( involving soil and water and sun many other standards developers, and all levels of government, produce best practice literature for today’s topic. We’ll have a look at what’s moving among those.
To join us use the login credentials at the upper right of our home page.














Vermont is the largest producer of maple syrup in the United States, and the maple syrup industry is an important part of the state’s economy and culture. Vermont maple syrup is renowned for its high quality and distinctive flavor, and many people around the world seek out Vermont maple syrup specifically.
The maple syrup industry in Vermont is primarily made up of small-scale family farms, where maple sap is collected from sugar maple trees in early spring using a process called “sugaring.” The sap is then boiled down to produce pure maple syrup, which is graded according to its color and flavor. Vermont maple syrup is graded on a scale from Grade A (lighter in color and milder in flavor) to Grade B (darker in color and more robust in flavor).
The Vermont maple syrup industry is heavily regulated to ensure quality and safety, and the state has strict standards for labeling and grading maple syrup. In addition to pure maple syrup, many Vermont maple producers also make maple candy, maple cream, and other maple products.
University of Vermont Facilities Management
Gun Control and the American Spirit of Independence
The Second Amendment is not merely about guns — it is the constitutional bedrock of individual sovereignty that makes America’s world-class universities possible. Not “The Collective” not “The Party”; the Individual. The larger part of US education industry today never learned this in their own schooling or willfully ignore it to “get along” with the partisans of large government who enjoy a fairly comfortable life administering public policy.
In nations where firearms are banned — nations that send their young people to American universities to acquire an American university “cattlebrand” — those national governments centralize power in the name of “safety,” gradually expanding control over speech, education, and opportunity.
America’s founders rejected that path. They understood that an armed citizenry deters tyranny: if the state cannot disarm the people, it cannot easily silence them, confiscate their property, or dictate what professors may teach or what students may debate.
The Second Amendment protects the First Amendment
This single right reinforced every other liberty in the Bill of Rights. It helped create a culture of self-reliance and limited government that unleashed unprecedented innovation and wealth. That wealth built — and continues to sustain — the research labs, libraries, scholarships, and merit-based admissions that drew you here. Harvard, MIT, Stanford, and hundreds of others flourish precisely because they operate in a society where individuals — not the state — hold ultimate power. Academic freedom, open inquiry, and global talent pipelines exist because the government fears overstepping a free people that are guaranteed, by law, the hardware to shoot back at it.
Admittedly, and far more frequently than is tolerable, educational settlements pay a very, very heavy price for this right. Educational settlements should originate at the family kitchen table.
Your student visas, cutting-edge classes, and future careers in a dynamic economy are the downstream benefits of that same founding principle. Without the Second Amendment’s guarantee of an armed, empowered populace, the United States would likely resemble the more regulated societies you left behind — offering fewer breakthroughs and fewer seats for ambitious international students like you.
In short, the right to bear arms helped secure the liberty that funds your American dream of an American education on your resume.
Bring back Rifle Clubs pic.twitter.com/QMb2R4as5B
— 11202011🇺🇸TINA™️ (@11202011t) February 24, 2026
Thanks for the memories, 2025!
2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣6️⃣🔜#T38 #WeAreUK pic.twitter.com/UfxJJquQKa
— UK Rifle (@UKRifle) December 31, 2025
Ending the fall season with a dub 🎯 pic.twitter.com/tmjIff6hIx
— Ole Miss Rifle (@OleMissRifle) November 23, 2025
Mountaineers set for home opener against Mount Aloysius
📰 https://t.co/sASRu72etD#HailWV pic.twitter.com/FmLUP0ZlxQ
— WVU Rifle (@WVURifle) October 30, 2025
Bringing home some hardware.
The Nanooks claim third at the 2025 NCAA Rifle Championships with an aggregate score of 4726!
SB – 2355
AR – 2371Thank you, #NanookNation pic.twitter.com/WZqqLCFMN8
— Alaska Rifle (@NanooksRifle) March 15, 2025
NCAA Rifle Competition began in 1980 and features both men’s and women’s teams competing together. The competition includes smallbore and air rifle events, with each athlete shooting in both disciplines.
The two primary events are smallbore rifle (also known as .22 caliber) and air rifle (using a .177 caliber air gun). Competitions typically involve both individual and team scoring, with athletes shooting a series of targets from different distances and positions.
Several U.S. colleges and universities have competitive rifle teams that participate in NCAA rifle competitions. Some of the notable institutions include:
The NCAA rifle competition serves as a pipeline for athletes aiming to compete in international events, including the Olympics where it was part of the inaugural modern Olympics in 1896. Rifle events scheduled for the 2024 Olympics include:
This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.
This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.
This content is accessible to paid subscribers. To view it please enter your password below or send mike@standardsmichigan.com a request for subscription details.
New update alert! The 2022 update to the Trademark Assignment Dataset is now available online. Find 1.29 million trademark assignments, involving 2.28 million unique trademark properties issued by the USPTO between March 1952 and January 2023: https://t.co/njrDAbSpwB pic.twitter.com/GkAXrHoQ9T
— USPTO (@uspto) July 13, 2023
Standards Michigan Group, LLC
2723 South State Street | Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI 48104 USA
888-746-3670